MRI contrast agent, gadobenate dimeglumine, safety profile confirmed in 7.5-year trial.
Gadobenate dimeglumine MRI contrast agent has rates of adverse reactions comparable to other gadolinium-based contrast agents, according to a study published in the American Journal of Roentgenology.
Researchers from the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center in Pennsylvania examined the findings of a prospective quality assurance project to determine the incidence of adverse effects with the contrast agent.
During the project, MRI technologists tracked all gadolinium-based contrast administrations at a large tertiary care center and a community hospital with a free-standing cancer treatment center, and any associated adverse reactions, including type of reaction and treatment rendered, between August 1, 2005, and March 14, 2013, a 7.5 year period.
The results showed that 132,252 doses of gadobenate dimeglumine were administered. A total of 236 reactions were recorded (0.18% of contrast-enhanced examinations). Of these, 133 (56.4% of all adverse reactions) required treatment and 12 (5.1%) qualified as serious, per FDA criteria.
The researchers found a significant difference between reaction rates at the academic center (0.23%) and the community hospital (0.07%). The reaction rates were higher in the first two years of study, tapering to a lower baseline rate, which was maintained over more than five years, they noted.
The authors concluded that their study confirmed the relatively robust safety profile of gadobenate dimeglumine.
Is MRI Contrast Enhancement Necessary for Long-Term Monitoring of Diffuse Glioma?
March 4th 2025In a comparison of contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (CET1w) MRI (and T2-weighted MRI/FLAIR imaging, researchers found that only three out of 82 cases of glioma progression were solely detected with CET1w MRI.
Can Deep Learning Ultra-Fast bpMRI Have an Impact in Prostate Cancer Imaging?
March 3rd 2025A deep learning-enhanced ultra-fast bpMRI protocol offered similar sensitivity for csPCa as mpMRI with an 80 percent reduction in scan time, according to research findings presented at the European Congress of Radiology (ECR) conference.