The Journal of the American College of Radiology tackles the provocative in its first issue of 2021.
It is a new year, and you might not look at radiology the same way again. At least, that appears to be the goal of the Journal of the American College of Radiology (JACR) in its January 2021 issue.
In this first month of the year, the journal is wading into topics and territories that are likely to raise differences of opinions and contentious conversations. And, that is the point.
“Rarely do we start an issue of the JACR with a trigger warning. This special issue will provoke strong reactions from our readers, including shock, offense, and even disgust,” wrote Christoph I. Lee, M.D., MS, JACR deputy editor. “The articles were deliberately selected to elicit these responses and will challenge the conventional wisdom across the imaging community.”
So, get ready to see the profession in a different light, said Lee’s co-authors Reed A. Omary, M.D., MS, JACR associate editor of leadership, and Caroline Chung, M.D., MSc, JACR associate editor of radiation oncology.
For more coverage based on industry expert insights and research, subscribe to the Diagnostic Imaging e-Newsletter here.
Within the articles – many of which are marked as open access this month – authors tackle ideas that “go against the grain,” said Lee and his colleagues. Ranging from whether whole-body advanced imaging for employees is advisable to whether wellness programs actually combat radiologist burnout effectively, from how much implicit bias impacts and explains the inequities in the profession to the ethical obligations around patient consent and artificial intelligence, these articles are intended to ignite thoughtful debate that can move the industry forward.
But, the issue’s overall objective is much larger. While these articles are intended to address difficult topics and provide different perspectives, the greater impetus is to remind providers of the vast number of opportunities available in radiology to actively impact patients’ health and well-being.
“By exploring the provocative,” said Lee and his colleagues, “we hope that this special issue inspires settlers to join those pioneers of the future and thereby expand the confines of radiology.”
Could AI-Powered Abbreviated MRI Reinvent Detection for Structural Abnormalities of the Knee?
April 24th 2025Employing deep learning image reconstruction, parallel imaging and multi-slice acceleration in a sub-five-minute 3T knee MRI, researchers noted 100 percent sensitivity and 99 percent specificity for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears.
The Reading Room Podcast: Emerging Trends in the Radiology Workforce
February 11th 2022Richard Duszak, MD, and Mina Makary, MD, discuss a number of issues, ranging from demographic trends and NPRPs to physician burnout and medical student recruitment, that figure to impact the radiology workforce now and in the near future.
What is the Best Use of AI in CT Lung Cancer Screening?
April 18th 2025In comparison to radiologist assessment, the use of AI to pre-screen patients with low-dose CT lung cancer screening provided a 12 percent reduction in mean interpretation time with a slight increase in specificity and a slight decrease in the recall rate, according to new research.
Meta-Analysis Shows Merits of AI with CTA Detection of Coronary Artery Stenosis and Calcified Plaque
April 16th 2025Artificial intelligence demonstrated higher AUC, sensitivity, and specificity than radiologists for detecting coronary artery stenosis > 50 percent on computed tomography angiography (CTA), according to a new 17-study meta-analysis.