Combined CT/MRI provides a more precise determination of LI-RADS category of hepatic observations.
Combining CT/MRI allows for a more precise determination of LI-RADS category of hepatic observations, but cost limits when it should be used, according to a study published in the journal European Radiology.
Researchers from Egypt sought to compare diagnostic performance and agreement between CT, MRI, and combined CT/MRI in reference to LI-RADS classification system to categorize hepatic observations detected in hepatic patients during screening ultrasound.
A total of 240 patients who underwent hepatic CT and MRI examinations, histopathology, and clinical and radiological follow-up, were included in the study. There were 296 liver observations detected during ultrasound surveillance. Using LI-RADS v2014, six radiologists evaluated the observations independently and assigned a LI-RADS category to each observation using CT, MRI and combined CT/MRI.
The results showed that combined CT and MRI in LI-RADS yielded better accuracy (91.29 percent), sensitivity (90.71 percent) and specificity (92.31 percent) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) diagnosis than using MRI or CT alone; accuracy, sensitivity and specificity decreased to 85.37 percent, 86.34 percent, and 83.65 percent, respectively, for MRI and 67.6 percent, 54.10 percent and 91.35 percent, respectively, for CT. The intraclass agreement of the LI-RADS scores between CT, MRI and combined CT/MRI was excellent.
The researchers concluded that both CT and MRI are complementary to each other, but combined CT/MRI provided a more precise determination of LI-RADS category of hepatic observations. However, the high cost in relation to the minor increase in accuracy suggests that the combination should only be utilized in cases of suspected HCC.
Stay at the forefront of radiology with the Diagnostic Imaging newsletter, delivering the latest news, clinical insights, and imaging advancements for today’s radiologists.
Large Medicare Study Shows Black Men Less Likely to Receive PET and MRI for Prostate Cancer Imaging
August 2nd 2025An analysis of over 749,000 Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with prostate cancer over a five-year period found that Black men were 13 percent less likely to receive PET imaging and 16 percent less likely to receive MRI in comparison to White men.
The Reading Room Podcast: Current and Emerging Insights on Abbreviated Breast MRI, Part 3
August 2nd 2025In the last of a three-part podcast episode, Stamatia Destounis, MD, Emily Conant, MD and Habib Rahbar, MD, share additional insights on practical considerations and potential challenges in integrating abbreviated breast MRI into clinical practice, and offer their thoughts on future research directions.
Twenty Years of CT Colonography for Colorectal Cancer Screening: What the Research Reveals
August 2nd 2025Computed tomography colonography (CTC) demonstrated a 91.6 percent positive predictive value (PPV) for polyps > 6 mm, according to new research involving over 9,000 patients who underwent CTC for primary asymptomatic colorectal cancer screening.
The Reading Room Podcast: A Closer Look at Remote MRI Safety, Part 3
August 2nd 2025In the third of a three-part podcast episode, Emanuel Kanal, M.D. and Tobias Gilk, MRSO, MRSE, discuss strategies for maintaining the integrity of time-out procedures and communication with remote MRI scanning.
Chest CT for Post-COVID-19 Abnormalities: Nine Takeaways from a Multi-Society Consensus Statement
August 2nd 2025Developed by 21 thoracic radiologists, the new international consensus statement addresses appropriate indications, scan acquisition and keys to reporting for the use of chest CT imaging in evaluating for residual lung abnormalities from COVID-19.