Interventional radiologic technologists appear to have a higher rate of developing certain types of cancers.
Technologists who perform fluoroscopically-guided interventional procedures appear to have elevated risks of brain cancer, breast cancer, and melanoma, according to a study published in the American Journal of Roentgenology.
Researchers from the National Cancer Institute in Rockville, MD, Hirosoft International in Eureka, CA, Information Management Systems, Inc. in Calverton, MD, the University of Minnesota in Minneapolis, and the Food and Drug Administration, in Silver Spring, MD, undertook a nationwide prospective cohort study to examine the risks of cancer incidence and mortality among radiation technologists who performed or assisted with fluoroscopically-guided interventional procedures.
A total of 90,957 radiologic technologists responded to the survey, which was made available from 1994 to 1998. The survey collected information on whether the technologists had ever worked with fluoroscopically-guided interventional procedures. This was followed through completion of a subsequent cohort survey during 2003 to 2005 to determine cancer incidence or December 31, 2008, for cancer mortality.[[{"type":"media","view_mode":"media_crop","fid":"47667","attributes":{"alt":"radiation","class":"media-image media-image-right","id":"media_crop_480520206017","media_crop_h":"0","media_crop_image_style":"-1","media_crop_instance":"5637","media_crop_rotate":"0","media_crop_scale_h":"0","media_crop_scale_w":"0","media_crop_w":"0","media_crop_x":"0","media_crop_y":"0","style":"height: 160px; width: 170px; border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 1px; float: right;","title":"©Preecha TH/Shutterstock.com","typeof":"foaf:Image"}}]]
The results showed that there was a two-fold increased risk of brain cancer mortality and modest elevations in incidence of melanoma and in breast cancer incidence, but not mortality, among technologists who performed fluoroscopically-guided interventional procedures compared with those who never performed these procedures.
There was also a small suggestive increase in incidence of all cancers combined, excluding nonmelanoma skin cancers, however the mortality from all cancers combined, excluding nonmelanoma skin cancers, was not elevated in this group. “We similarly observed no elevated risk of cancers of the thyroid, skin other than melanoma, prostate, lung, or colon and rectum or of leukemia that was not chronic lymphocytic leukemia among workers who performed fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures,” the authors wrote.
The researchers concluded that more study needs to be done to confirm their findings. The exposure to low-dose radiation is one possible explanation for the increase in cancer rates among technologists who perform or assist with these procedures, however, the increase could also be due to chance or unmeasured confounding by nonradiation risk factors, they noted.
A Victory for Radiology: New CMS Proposal Would Provide Coverage of CT Colonography in 2025
July 12th 2024In newly issued proposals addressing changes to coverage for Medicare services in 2025, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) announced its intent to provide coverage of computed tomography colonography (CTC) for Medicare beneficiaries in 2025.
The Reading Room: Artificial Intelligence: What RSNA 2020 Offered, and What 2021 Could Bring
December 5th 2020Nina Kottler, M.D., chief medical officer of AI at Radiology Partners, discusses, during RSNA 2020, what new developments the annual meeting provided about these technologies, sessions to access, and what to expect in the coming year.
ACR Collaborative Model Leads to 35 Percent Improvement with Mammography Positioning Criteria
July 1st 2024Noting significant variation with facilities for achieving passing criteria for mammography positioning, researchers found that structured interventions, ranging from weekly auditing of images taken by technologists to mechanisms for feedback from radiologists to technologists, led to significant improvements in a multicenter study.
New Study Shows Non-Radiologists Interpreting 28 Percent of Imaging for Medicare Patients
June 28th 2024While radiologists interpreted approximately 99 percent of all non-cardiac CT, MRI and nuclear medicine studies in hospital and emergency department settings for Medicare beneficiaries, new research shows significantly less radiologist review of cardiac imaging and office-based imaging.