More radiology tests found to be of low-value in the emergency room.
Five exams - including four imaging tests - have been deemed “low value” in the emergency room for certain patients, according to an article published in JAMA Internal Medicine. This latest list comes on the heels of the Choosing Wisely Campaign, which advises different specialties about tests that may have little value, including radiology exams.
Researchers from Partners HealthCare in Boston, Mass., sought to create a list of five tests, treatments, and disposition decisions, in addition to those already identified, which are of little value, are amenable to standardization, and are actionable by emergency medicine clinicians. To do so, the researchers surveyed 283 emergency medicine clinicians (physicians, physician assistants, and nurse practitioners) from six emergency departments.
A technical expert panel was assembled, which conducted a modified Delphi process to identify a top-five list using a four-step process.
The researchers developed this new top-five list:
The authors concluded that their panel identified clinical actions that were of low value and within the control of emergency department healthcare providers. “This method can be used to identify additional actionable targets of overuse in emergency medicine,” they wrote.
Stay at the forefront of radiology with the Diagnostic Imaging newsletter, delivering the latest news, clinical insights, and imaging advancements for today’s radiologists.
Study Shows Enhanced Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Stenosis with Photon-Counting CTA
July 10th 2025In a new study comparing standard resolution and ultra-high resolution modes for patients undergoing coronary CTA with photon-counting detector CT, researchers found that segment-level sensitivity and accuracy rates for diagnosing coronary artery stenosis were consistently > 89.6 percent.
Can CT-Based Deep Learning Bolster Prognostic Assessments of Ground-Glass Nodules?
June 19th 2025Emerging research shows that a multiple time-series deep learning model assessment of CT images provides 20 percent higher sensitivity than a delta radiomic model and 56 percent higher sensitivity than a clinical model for prognostic evaluation of ground-glass nodules.