Radiologists often fail to request patients' informed consent for imaging examinations, and even when they do, many patients are not fully informed about radiation exposure and long-term risk, according to a cardiologist.
Assessing radiological risk is complicated, but doctors must share certain important details with patients, Dr. Eugenio Picano wrote in the British Medical Journal (Oct. 4, 2004;329:849-851). Failure to do so violates basic principles of modern medical practice and disregards patients' rights.
"The language of radiation protection is not readily understood by non-specialists, and it is easy to get lost in a lexicon that expresses radiation doses in megabecquerels and risks as nominal probability coefficients for stochastic effects. The hapless prescribing (and practising) physician who wants to know about radiation risk enters a Tower of Babel, where essential information is 'hidden beneath the veil of verses so obscure,'" wrote Picano, a staff member of the Institute of Clinical Physiology at the National Research Council in Pisa, Italy.
Risk can be communicated to patients by expressing the dose as multiples of a chest x-ray, and the risk of cancer can be explained by the number of extra cases in the exposed population. The U.K. College of Radiologists has suggested this method, and the European Commission had endorsed it. Explanation of dose should be mandatory for the higher risk investigations, Picano said.
"Better knowledge of risks will help us to avoid small individual risks translating into substantial population risks," he said. "Radiological protection should come to mean not just another form to fill in, but a way of thinking, so that long-term risk is familiar to doctors."
MRI-Based AI Radiomics Model Offers 'Robust' Prediction of Perineural Invasion in Prostate Cancer
July 26th 2024A model that combines MRI-based deep learning radiomics and clinical factors demonstrated an 84.8 percent ROC AUC and a 92.6 percent precision-recall AUC for predicting perineural invasion in prostate cancer cases.
Breast MRI Study Examines Common Factors with False Negatives and False Positives
July 24th 2024The absence of ipsilateral breast hypervascularity is three times more likely to be associated with false-negative findings on breast MRI and non-mass enhancement lesions have a 4.5-fold likelihood of being linked to false-positive results, according to new research.
Can Polyenergetic Reconstruction Help Resolve Streak Artifacts in Photon Counting CT?
July 22nd 2024New research looking at photon-counting computed tomography (PCCT) demonstrated significantly reduced variation and tracheal air density attenuation with polyenergetic reconstruction in contrast to monoenergetic reconstruction on chest CT.