Temporal subtractions and nodule detection are the most common computer-aided detection systems available. Until recently, however, no report has described these CAD routines being integrated into PACS.
Temporal subtractions and nodule detection are the most common computer-aided detection systems available. Until recently, however, no report has described these CAD routines being integrated into PACS.
That changed in March, when Japanese researchers at Kyushu University reported their four-year experience integrating a temporal subtraction and nodule detection CAD system into their hospital PACS (J Digit Imaging 2008;21[1]:91-98).
"Our paper provides a concrete model in which a CAD system was integrated into our hospital PACS so radiologists can refer to CAD images at interpretation time," said Dr. Shuji Sakai, an associate professor of radiology at the university's school of medicine.
The linkage between PACS and CAD on digital chest radiographs is important to make workflow more efficient, Sakai said.
"We integrated the exclusive server used for producing temporal subtraction and nodule detection images into our PACS, so now current and prior CAD images are automatically loaded into the display terminal," he said.
This image-loading technique can easily be applied to other CAD systems, such as mammography, gastrointestinal examinations, and CT, Sakai said.
Sakai's paper reports several problems encountered during the integration process, including an excessive false-positive rate on the nodule detection system. This occurred because algorithms for the system had never been adjusted to chest radiographs obtained on hospital equipment.
"Each hospital has to customize its CAD systems appropriately according to its own environment to obtain suitable performance," Sakai said.
Another problem encountered was image orientation. Correct temporal subtraction images are not produced in portable chest radiographs when the original images are stored in PACS upside down. To solve this, Sakai delays PACS storage until a radiology technologist can verify correct image top and bottom. Automatic software to correct image direction does not work because these packages cannot recognize a lateral decubitus chest radiograph, Sakai said.
"When a technologist is used to check image direction, all chest radiographs can be stored with the correct top and bottom, so temporal subtraction images can be properly produced," he said.
A third problem surfaced with low image quality when temporal subtraction was performed on images obtained on different devices.
"Poor temporal subtraction image quality in these circumstances was not caused by misregistration artifacts but by the differences in gray scales of the different acquisition devices," Sakai said.
An adequate solution to this problem has not yet been found. In the meantime, Sakai attempts to obtain chest radiographs for each patient from the same device.
AI-Initiated Recalls After Screening Mammography Demonstrate Higher PPV for Breast Cancer
March 18th 2025While recalls initiated by one of two reviewing radiologists after screening mammography were nearly 10 percent higher than recalls initiated by an AI software, the AI-initiated recalls had an 85 percent higher positive predictive value for breast cancer, according to a new study.
ECR Mammography Study: Pre-Op CEM Detects 34 Percent More Multifocal Masses than Mammography
February 28th 2025In addition to contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) demonstrating over a 90 percent detection rate for multifocal masses, researchers found that no significant difference between histological measurements and CEM, according to study findings presented at the European Congress of Radiology.
Study: Mammography AI Leads to 29 Percent Increase in Breast Cancer Detection
February 5th 2025Use of the mammography AI software had a nearly equivalent false positive rate as unassisted radiologist interpretation and resulted in a 44 percent reduction in screen reading workload, according to findings from a randomized controlled trial involving over 105,000 women.