Digital mammography may be feasible using low-dose radiation dose techniques.
Low-dose techniques for digital mammography may be feasible, as results are not substantially affected by variations in radiation dose, according to a study published in Radiology.
Researchers from the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia performed a retrospective analysis to determine the impact of radiation dose on breast density estimation in digital mammography.
The researchers analyzed 5,832 images from 486 women who had undergone breast screening with a combination of dose protocols, including standard full-field digital mammography, low-dose digital mammography, and digital breast tomosynthesis. Clinical Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) density assessment results were also available from the trial reports.
The results showed that the radiation dose of image acquisition did not significantly affect quantitative density measurements. The percent density demonstrated a high overall correlation between protocols. The researchers did find, however, that differences in breast percent density (1.04% and 3.84%) were observed within high BI-RADS density categories. They were significantly correlated across the different acquisition dose levels.[[{"type":"media","view_mode":"media_crop","fid":"51665","attributes":{"alt":"Mammography","class":"media-image media-image-right","id":"media_crop_5156367237616","media_crop_h":"0","media_crop_image_style":"-1","media_crop_instance":"6372","media_crop_rotate":"0","media_crop_scale_h":"0","media_crop_scale_w":"0","media_crop_w":"0","media_crop_x":"0","media_crop_y":"0","style":"height: 114px; width: 171px; border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 1px; float: right;","title":"©zlikovec/Shutterstock.com","typeof":"foaf:Image"}}]]
“Precision and reproducibility of automated breast density measurements with digital mammography are not substantially affected by variations in radiation dose; thus, the use of low-dose techniques for the purpose of density estimation may be feasible,” the researchers concluded.
Stay at the forefront of radiology with the Diagnostic Imaging newsletter, delivering the latest news, clinical insights, and imaging advancements for today’s radiologists.
Mammography Study: AI Facilitates Greater Accuracy and Longer Fixation Time on Suspicious Areas
July 8th 2025While noting no differences in sensitivity, specificity or reading time with adjunctive AI for mammography screening, the authors of a new study noted a 4 percent higher AUC and increased fixation time on lesion regions.
Where Things Stand with the Radiologist Shortage
June 18th 2025A new report conveys the cumulative impact of ongoing challenges with radiologist residency positions, reimbursement, post-COVID-19 attrition rates and the aging of the population upon the persistent shortage of radiologists in the United States.
Can Contrast-Enhanced Mammography be a Viable Screening Alternative to Breast MRI?
June 17th 2025While the addition of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) to digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) led to over a 13 percent increase in false positive cases, researchers also noted over double the cancer yield per 1,000 women in comparison to DBT alone.