|Articles|February 11, 2015

Lung-RADS Reduces False Positives, But Also Sensitivity

Low-dose CT screening for lung cancer following Lung-RADS criteria may reduce false positives, but it also decreases sensitivity.

Lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography may substantially reduce the false-positive result rate, but sensitivity is also decreased, according to a study published in the Annals of Internal Medicine.

Researchers from several states performed a study to assess the retrospective application of the Lung-RADS criteria to the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST).

The study included 26,722 participants (aged 55 to 74) who had undergone three annual low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) scans. The subjects had at least a 30–pack-year history of smoking, and were current smokers or had quit within the past 15 years.

The results showed that 26,455 participants received a baseline screen and 48,671 screenings were performed after baseline.

 
At baseline
After baseline
False-positive rate for Lung-RADS
12.8%
5.3%
False-positive rate for NLST
26.6%
21.8%
Baseline sensitivity for Lung-RADS
84.9%
78.6%
Baseline sensitivity for NLST
93.5%
93.8%

 

 

 

 

 

 

The researchers concluded that while Lung-RADS may substantially reduce the false-positive result rate, sensitivity is also decreased. They suggest that the effect of using Lung-RADS criteria in clinical practice must be carefully studied.


Related to this article

Does kV Still Matter in Photon-Counting CT?
Emerging research demonstrates the increasing stability of attenuation on clinically relevant VMIs with photon-counting CT and a redefined role of kV that may have implications for longitudinal quantitative CT.
CT Radiation Dosing: Where Things Stand, Part 2
In the second of a two-part interview, Kalpana Kanal, PhD, and Mahadevappa Mahesh, MS, PhD, FAPPM, FACR, discussed future directions for research on CT radiation dosing, including the potential of indication-specific diagnostic reference levels (DRLs).
CT Radiation Dosing: Where Things Stand, Part 1
In the first of a two-part interview, Kalpana Kanal, PhD, and Mahadevappa Mahesh, MS, PhD, FAPPM, FACR, discussed recently published research showing significant declines in computed tomography (CT) radiation dosing over the past decade.