Maintenance of Certification Exam, Thanks for the Memory
Studying for my maintenance of certification exam sends me down memory lane, as I rediscovered the purer aspects of radiology
I mentioned a few columns ago that I was prepping for my maintenance of certification (MOC) exam. Well, time has marched on, and in just a few days I'll be finding out how relevant my studying has been.
As said in the previous column, I was experiencing a surprising wisp of nostalgia at being back in study mode. I think I've put my finger more firmly on this phenomenon, now that some more weeks have gone by.
Simply put, radiology cases, as presented in the context of testing an examinee's knowledge, are "clean" as compared with the mess I've come to expect in my daily workload over the past decade.
Right off the bat, a studying (or test taking) radiologist knows what subspecialty area is involved. There's no forgetting that you decided to study your neuro cases today, for instance, or that you selected the MOC neuro module. Even if there was, you'd probably figure out pretty quickly that you were looking at a bunch of head, neck, and spine images. You'd be zeroing in on neuro-related pathology, and quite a bit more comfortable not checking the nearby soft tissues for an incidental renal carcinoma or lung-apex nodule - which you'd darned well better not miss in "real life" cases.
Another nice, "clean" aspect of studying cases (and at least in the sample questions shown on the MOC website) is that you are presented with a single image from which the diagnosis can be made. Maybe a handful of images, such as if it's an MRI. The findings (or lack thereof, since the MOC exam is supposed to include normals) are right there, rather than buried in a thousand-image multiphasic CTA with recons.
Then, the crowning glory: With the notable exception of "history withheld" cases, your study source (or exam question) proceeds to give you a nice, pertinent bit of history. Bingo, your six-item differential just got narrowed - maybe to a single disease entity! Or at least, if you hadn't yet noticed the subtle abnormality, you might now be clued in on where to look.
How frequently do you get that kind of clinical info in your daily workload?
So, again, it's been a surprisingly nice trip down memory lane, studying for this thing. I've rediscovered the purer aspects of radiology which made the field appealing to me in the first place. Perhaps regained some hope that we may see a greater degree of "cleanliness" in our field in years to come (hopefully I pass muster and continue to be a part of it).
And, oh yes, managed to learn a thing or three along the way.
Where Things Stand with the Radiologist Shortage
June 18th 2025A new report conveys the cumulative impact of ongoing challenges with radiologist residency positions, reimbursement, post-COVID-19 attrition rates and the aging of the population upon the persistent shortage of radiologists in the United States.
How to Successfully Launch a CCTA Program at Your Hospital or Practice
June 11th 2025Emphasizing increasing recognition of the capability of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) for the evaluation of acute and stable chest pain, this author defuses common misperceptions and reviews key considerations for implementation of a CCTA program.
The Reading Room: Artificial Intelligence: What RSNA 2020 Offered, and What 2021 Could Bring
December 5th 2020Nina Kottler, M.D., chief medical officer of AI at Radiology Partners, discusses, during RSNA 2020, what new developments the annual meeting provided about these technologies, sessions to access, and what to expect in the coming year.
Mammography AI Platform for Five-Year Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Gets FDA De Novo Authorization
June 2nd 2025Through AI recognition of subtle patterns in breast tissue on screening mammograms, the Clairity Breast software reportedly provides validated risk scoring for predicting one’s five-year risk of breast cancer.