Maintenance of Certification: Quality Measure or Costly Burden?
What do you think of the maintenance of certification requirements? A common-sense effort to drive quality, or an unproven and costly burden?
Maintenance of Certification is a hot topic again.
The American Association of Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) is suing the American Board of Medical Specialties over their MOC program, saying it’s an infringement on trade and reduces access to patients.
Opponents of MOC claim that the requirements are burdensome, that there is no evidence that it improves quality of care and that it creates a cartel for the provision for educational material, sometimes in nice locations such as an Alaskan Cruise ship.
Many physicians are outraged, not only at the cost to maintain certification, but also by the fear that it could become a requirement for hospital privileges, Jane Orient, MD, the AAPS' executive director, told Physicians Practice.
On the other hand, proponents of MOC claim that this enhances patient care by creating a quality floor that all doctors must meet. In this way it spreads the net for incompetent physicians. The requirements measure six core competencies, some clinical, some interprofessional.
What do you think of the maintenance of certification requirements? A common-sense effort to drive quality, or an unproven and costly burden? Tell us in the comments below.
Newsletter
Stay at the forefront of radiology with the Diagnostic Imaging newsletter, delivering the latest news, clinical insights, and imaging advancements for today’s radiologists.
Where Things Stand with the Radiologist Shortage
June 18th 2025A new report conveys the cumulative impact of ongoing challenges with radiologist residency positions, reimbursement, post-COVID-19 attrition rates and the aging of the population upon the persistent shortage of radiologists in the United States.
How to Successfully Launch a CCTA Program at Your Hospital or Practice
June 11th 2025Emphasizing increasing recognition of the capability of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) for the evaluation of acute and stable chest pain, this author defuses common misperceptions and reviews key considerations for implementation of a CCTA program.
The Reading Room: Artificial Intelligence: What RSNA 2020 Offered, and What 2021 Could Bring
December 5th 2020Nina Kottler, M.D., chief medical officer of AI at Radiology Partners, discusses, during RSNA 2020, what new developments the annual meeting provided about these technologies, sessions to access, and what to expect in the coming year.
Mammography AI Platform for Five-Year Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Gets FDA De Novo Authorization
June 2nd 2025Through AI recognition of subtle patterns in breast tissue on screening mammograms, the Clairity Breast software reportedly provides validated risk scoring for predicting one’s five-year risk of breast cancer.
