Despite undergoing more imaging outside the VA system, men with low-risk prostate cancer don’t show an improvement in care quality.
Veterans with low-risk prostate cancer who use Medicare rather than the VA for healthcare could undergo more imaging without an improvement in the quality of care, according to a study published in the JAMA Network Open.
Researchers from New York, Seattle, and Connecticut sought to assess the association between prostate cancer imaging rates and the VA setting compared with the fee-for-service setting. A total of 98,867 men with prostate cancer (77.4 percent white; mean age, 70.26 years) participated in the study.
All men received a diagnosis of prostate cancer from Jan. 1, 2004, through March 31, 2008. The data were collected from the VA Central Cancer Registry, linked to administrate claims and Medicare utilization records, and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program database. Three distinct nationally representative cohorts were constructed (use of VA only, use of Medicare only, and dual use of VA and Medicare).
The study cohort comprised:
• Medicare-only: 57.3 percent
• VA and Medicare: 14.5 percent
• VA-only: 28.1 percent
Among men with low-risk prostate cancer, the Medicare-only group had the highest rate of guideline-discordant imaging:
• Medicare-only: 52.5 percent
• VA and Medicare: 50.9 percent
• VA-only: 45.9 percent
Imaging rates for men with high-risk prostate cancer were not significantly different among the three groups. Multivariable analysis showed that individuals in the VA and Medicare group and VA-only group (were less likely to receive guideline-discordant imaging than those in the Medicare-only group.
The researchers concluded that when men with low-risk prostate cancer sought care outside the VA, they used more health services but did not see an improvement in the quality of care.
Stay at the forefront of radiology with the Diagnostic Imaging newsletter, delivering the latest news, clinical insights, and imaging advancements for today’s radiologists.
Can CT-Based Deep Learning Bolster Prognostic Assessments of Ground-Glass Nodules?
June 19th 2025Emerging research shows that a multiple time-series deep learning model assessment of CT images provides 20 percent higher sensitivity than a delta radiomic model and 56 percent higher sensitivity than a clinical model for prognostic evaluation of ground-glass nodules.
Where Things Stand with the Radiologist Shortage
June 18th 2025A new report conveys the cumulative impact of ongoing challenges with radiologist residency positions, reimbursement, post-COVID-19 attrition rates and the aging of the population upon the persistent shortage of radiologists in the United States.