MRI as Accurate as Conditional CT in Detecting Adult Appendicitis
MRI may replace conditional CT for appendicitis detection in adults because of its similar accuracy rate.
Conditional or immediate MR imaging was as accurate in detecting appendicitis in adult patients as was conditional CT, according to a study published in the journal Radiology.
Researchers from several centers in the Netherlands compared the diagnostic performance of MRI and CT in 230 adult patients (40 percent men, median age 35 years) who presented with symptoms of appendicitis. The patients underwent ultrasonography and subsequent contrast enhanced CT if the ultrasound was negative or inconclusive. The patients also underwent unenhanced MRI.
The MRI reader was blinded to the US and CT findings and an expert panel assigned diagnosis after three months.
A total of 115 CT and 223 MRIs were performed on the patients between March and September 2010. Appendicitis was the final diagnosis for 118 patients. The researchers found that the conditional MRI missed 3 percent of the appendicitis diagnoses and resulted in 8 percent false positives. Immediate MRI also missed 3 percent of diagnosis and produced 6 percent false positives. The MRI (conditional and immediate) sensitivity and specificity was comparable to the conditional CT, which missed 2 percent of the diagnoses and generated 10 percent false positives.
The researchers also found that conditional imaging resulted in more false positives in women than in men but immediate MRI did not.
The researchers concluded that the accuracy of both conditional and immediate MRIs was similar to that of conditional CT when investigating adults for appendicitis.
Newsletter
Stay at the forefront of radiology with the Diagnostic Imaging newsletter, delivering the latest news, clinical insights, and imaging advancements for today’s radiologists.
Large Medicare Study Shows Black Men Less Likely to Receive PET and MRI for Prostate Cancer Imaging
August 1st 2025An analysis of over 749,000 Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with prostate cancer over a five-year period found that Black men were 13 percent less likely to receive PET imaging and 16 percent less likely to receive MRI in comparison to White men.
The Reading Room Podcast: A Closer Look at Remote MRI Safety, Part 3
August 1st 2025In the third of a three-part podcast episode, Emanuel Kanal, M.D. and Tobias Gilk, MRSO, MRSE, discuss strategies for maintaining the integrity of time-out procedures and communication with remote MRI scanning.
Twenty Years of CT Colonography for Colorectal Cancer Screening: What the Research Reveals
August 1st 2025Computed tomography colonography (CTC) demonstrated a 91.6 percent positive predictive value (PPV) for polyps > 6 mm, according to new research involving over 9,000 patients who underwent CTC for primary asymptomatic colorectal cancer screening.
The Reading Room Podcast: A Closer Look at Remote MRI Safety, Part 2
August 1st 2025In the second of a multi-part podcast episode, Emanuel Kanal, M.D. and Tobias Gilk, MRSO, MRSE, share their perspectives on remote MRI safety protocols for ensuring screening accuracy and adherence to conditional implant guidelines as well as a rapid and effective response to adverse events.
Chest CT for Post-COVID-19 Abnormalities: Nine Takeaways from a Multi-Society Consensus Statement
August 1st 2025Developed by 21 thoracic radiologists, the new international consensus statement addresses appropriate indications, scan acquisition and keys to reporting for the use of chest CT imaging in evaluating for residual lung abnormalities from COVID-19.
