The largest-ever study on the effects of magnetic resonance imaging on pacemakers and defilibrators has concluded that the imagers are indeed safe for those with these cardiac rhythm management devices.
The largest-ever study on the effects of magnetic resonance imaging on pacemakers and defibrillators has concluded that the imagers are indeed safe for those with these cardiac rhythm management devices.
That’s the conclusion of a new study published in the October edition of Annals of Internal Medicine. The journal also published an editorial and a summary for patients on the findings.
Millions of Americans live with pacemakers and defibrillators, with hundreds of thousands implanted annually. Because of concerns about MRI machines’ intense magnetic fields causing the devices to malfunction, physicians have avoided MRI scans for such patients, though an estimated 75 percent of such patients could benefit from scans, the authors estimated.
A team led by Saman Nazarian, MD, of Johns Hopkins University, conducted 555 MRI scans on 438 patients with pacemakers (237) or defibrillators (201). Of the 555 MRI examinations, 222 (40 percent) were of the brain, 122 (22 percent) were of the spine, 89 (16 percent) were of the heart, 72 (13 percent) were of the abdomen or pelvis, and 50 (9 percent) were of an extremity. The team monitored patients before, during, and after the scans.
Overall, just three patients experienced problems with the devices, and none had a serious problem.
Patients were selected and treated based on previous safety studies. Therefore, only those with pacemakers manufactured after 1998 and defibrillators manufactured after 2000 were enrolled, and the researchers carefully followed programming and monitoring protocol.
Can Contrast-Enhanced Mammography be a Viable Screening Alternative to Breast MRI?
June 17th 2025While the addition of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) to digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) led to over a 13 percent increase in false positive cases, researchers also noted over double the cancer yield per 1,000 women in comparison to DBT alone.
FDA Clears Enhanced MRI-Guided Laser Ablation System
June 5th 2025An alternative to an open neurosurgical approach, the Visualase V2 MRI-Guided Laser Ablation System reportedly utilizes laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) for targeted soft tissue ablation in patients with brain tumors and focal epilepsy.
Possible Real-Time Adaptive Approach to Breast MRI Suggests ‘New Era’ of AI-Directed MRI
June 3rd 2025Assessing the simulated use of AI-generated suspicion scores for determining whether one should continue with full MRI or shift to an abbreviated MRI, the authors of a new study noted comparable sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value for biopsies between the MRI approaches.