Magnetization transfer (MT) contrast-prepared magnetic resonance imaging is “unlikely to be of clinical utility” in diagnosing cirrhosis, according to a study published online Nov. 23 in the journal Radiology.
Magnetization transfer (MT) contrast-prepared magnetic resonance imaging is “unlikely to be of clinical utility” in diagnosing cirrhosis, according to a study published online Nov. 23 in the journal Radiology.
The study did confirm the ability of MT contrast prepared MRI to help distinguish substances of varying protein concentration, according to New York University researchers led by radiologist Andrew B. Rosenkrantz, MD.
Researchers studied 20 patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension and 20 healthy volunteers with no known liver disease. Rosenkrantz and colleagues had previously optimized the MT sequence using agar phantoms with protein concentrations ranging from 0 percent to 4 percent. The subjects underwent liver MR imaging that included eight separate breath-hold MT contrast sequences, each performed by using a different MT pulse frequency offset (range, 200–2500 Hz). Regions of interest were then placed to calculate the MT ratio for the liver, fat, and muscle in the volunteer group and for the liver in the cirrhosis group.
The MT ratio was nearly identical between healthy (26.0 percent to 80.0 percent) and cirrhotic livers (26.7 percent to 81.2 percent) for all frequency offsets.
But as has been showed with previous studies, MT ratio can indeed differentiate tissue types. MT ratio increased with decreasing MT pulse frequency offset for each of the four phantoms and the assessed in vivo tissues, consistent with previous reports. At all frequency offsets, MT ratio increased with increasing phantom protein concentration. In volunteers, at frequency offsets greater than 400 Hz, the MT ratio was significantly greater for muscle (34.4 percent to 54.9 percent) and much lower for subcutaneous fat (10.3 percent to 12.6 percent), compared with that for the liver (22.8 percent to 46.9 percent).
Meta-Analysis Shows No Difference Between bpMRI and mpMRI in Ruling Out csPCa
March 6th 2025In an 18-study meta-analysis involving over 4,600 patients, researchers found that bpMRI and mpMRI had equivalent pooled negative predictive value (NPV) of 92 percent for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa).
Is MRI Contrast Enhancement Necessary for Long-Term Monitoring of Diffuse Glioma?
March 4th 2025In a comparison of contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (CET1w) MRI (and T2-weighted MRI/FLAIR imaging, researchers found that only three out of 82 cases of glioma progression were solely detected with CET1w MRI.
Emerging AI Software for Prostate MRI Offers 95 Percent Sensitivity for csPCa
February 28th 2025In a multicenter study involving over 1,000 patients, a deep learning software offered comparable sensitivity and specificity for Gleason grade group > 2 tumors in comparison to radiologist interpretation.