Facilities that overlook a radiology department’s organizational and political nuances during PACS implementation do so at their own risk, according to researchers at Children’s Hospital in Boston. Understanding a department’s organizational structure is key to implementation success.
Facilities that overlook a radiology department's organizational and political nuances during PACS implementation do so at their own risk, according to researchers at Children's Hospital in Boston. Understanding a department's organizational structure is key to implementation success.
Financial justification, vendor selection, installation timelines, interface coordination, and acceptance testing are all well-worn components of PACS implementation. But these alone are not sufficient for success.
A recent study reports that the ability of radiology managers to view organizational issues from multiple perspectives is equally important in determining the success of PACS or voice recognition projects (AJR 2005;184(6):1727-1730).
"Radiology leaders who implement a new technology that affects the way people work must pay attention to how the new system affects the organizational structure, the human resource issues of the organization, the organizational politics, and the organization's culture," said Dr. Robert T. Bramson, a radiologist at Children's.
Attention to organizational details is important because resistance to change can lead to prolonged, failed, or inefficient implementations.
Bramson's research applies to four organizational perspectives:
Radiologists, who are trained in technical skills, may be inclined to look primarily at change in structural terms, focusing on workflow reorganization and who does what. This is a risky strategy, according to Bramson.
"Looking at an organization and trying to change it by using only one or two perspectives, as many leaders do, invites failure," he said. "The ability to step back and examine an organizational situation from different perspectives allows a radiology leader to better understand the challenges of implementing new technologies like PACS and to develop a more varied set of potential strategies for avoiding or overcoming problems."
Resistance to changing work procedures may not come exclusively from any one group. It may stem from frontline workers, radiologists, other radiology leaders, or people entirely outside the department.
"Using these four perspectives will help implementers design strategies for overcoming that resistance," Bramson said.
Can Photon-Counting CT be an Alternative to MRI for Assessing Liver Fat Fraction?
March 21st 2025Photon-counting CT fat fraction evaluation offered a maximum sensitivity of 81 percent for detecting steatosis and had a 91 percent ICC agreement with MRI proton density fat fraction assessment, according to new prospective research.
The Reading Room Podcast: Current Perspectives on the Updated Appropriate Use Criteria for Brain PET
March 18th 2025In a new podcast, Satoshi Minoshima, M.D., Ph.D., and James Williams, Ph.D., share their insights on the recently updated appropriate use criteria for amyloid PET and tau PET in patients with mild cognitive impairment.
Strategies to Reduce Disparities in Interventional Radiology Care
March 19th 2025In order to help address the geographic, racial, and socioeconomic barriers that limit patient access to interventional radiology (IR) care, these authors recommend a variety of measures ranging from increased patient and physician awareness of IR to mobile IR clinics and improved understanding of social determinants of health.
AI-Initiated Recalls After Screening Mammography Demonstrate Higher PPV for Breast Cancer
March 18th 2025While recalls initiated by one of two reviewing radiologists after screening mammography were nearly 10 percent higher than recalls initiated by an AI software, the AI-initiated recalls had an 85 percent higher positive predictive value for breast cancer, according to a new study.