Cancer screening is a good thing, say people in the UK, but fewer than half understand associated risks to screening like mammography.
Most people agree that cancer screening is important and should be performed, but less than half understand risks associated with the screening, according to a study published in the British Journal of Cancer.
Researchers from the United Kingdom performed a population-based survey that asked 1,895 subjects (975 women and 920 men) about their attitudes regarding cancer screening, and their own screening history and demographic characteristics. The subjects were aged 50 to 80. The results showed:
• Nearly 90% of respondents agreed that screening is ‘almost always a good idea’
• 75% believed that earlier detection means treatment can save lives ‘most’ or ‘all’ of the time
• 64% thought early diagnosis means less treatment is needed ‘most’ or ‘all’ of the time
• 49% were previously unaware that some cancers are slow-growing and unlikely to cause problems
• 45% wanted to be tested for slow-growing cancers or those unlikely to cause problems
• 49% wanted to be tested for a cancer for which nothing could be done
• Almost 60% regarded declining a screening offer as ‘irresponsible’
• 72% believed they had received the right number of screening tests in the past
"It's great that people are enthusiastic about cancer screening, and if people are keen to be screened, we need to minimize any barriers,” lead researcher Dr. Jo Waller said in a release. “But it's also important to remember that taking part in screening is an individual choice, and if someone decides that screening is not for them after considering the benefits and harms then that choice should be respected."
Stay at the forefront of radiology with the Diagnostic Imaging newsletter, delivering the latest news, clinical insights, and imaging advancements for today’s radiologists.
Mammography Study: AI Facilitates Greater Accuracy and Longer Fixation Time on Suspicious Areas
July 8th 2025While noting no differences in sensitivity, specificity or reading time with adjunctive AI for mammography screening, the authors of a new study noted a 4 percent higher AUC and increased fixation time on lesion regions.
Where Things Stand with the Radiologist Shortage
June 18th 2025A new report conveys the cumulative impact of ongoing challenges with radiologist residency positions, reimbursement, post-COVID-19 attrition rates and the aging of the population upon the persistent shortage of radiologists in the United States.
Can Contrast-Enhanced Mammography be a Viable Screening Alternative to Breast MRI?
June 17th 2025While the addition of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) to digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) led to over a 13 percent increase in false positive cases, researchers also noted over double the cancer yield per 1,000 women in comparison to DBT alone.