Point/counterpoint provides food for thought in nuclear medicine
One of the things a good newsmagazine should do is provide contrasting opinions on important issues. It is something we try to achieve with nearly every article we carry.
One of the things a good newsmagazine should do is provide contrasting opinions on important issues. It is something we try to achieve with nearly every article we carry.
On rare occasions, we have the opportunity to present side-by-side contrasting viewpoints on a timely topic. This month is one of those occasions.
Beginning on page 51, you'll find a point/counterpoint presentation on the future of SPECT imaging and whether it will be supplanted by PET.
Dr. Abass Alavi and Dr. Stanley Goldsmith articulate the pro (PET) and con (SPECT) positions. The articles were commissioned by DI news editor C.P. Kaiser.
The debate is an ideal one for the June issue, which traditionally has a nuclear medicine focus and is distributed at the Society of Nuclear Medicine meeting that takes place this month.
Whether you end up agreeing with Alavi that PET is already replacing SPECT in many indications and will soon take over all of them, or with Goldsmith that SPECT will play an important role in nuclear medicine for many years to come, I think you'll find the discussion enlightening from both a clinical and an economic perspective.
I think you'll also find the discussion contains useful information for both nuclear medicine physicians and the radiologists who practice nuclear medicine on a part-time basis.
John C. Hayes is editor of Diagnostic Imaging
Newsletter
Stay at the forefront of radiology with the Diagnostic Imaging newsletter, delivering the latest news, clinical insights, and imaging advancements for today’s radiologists.
Study Shows Enhanced Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Stenosis with Photon-Counting CTA
July 10th 2025In a new study comparing standard resolution and ultra-high resolution modes for patients undergoing coronary CTA with photon-counting detector CT, researchers found that segment-level sensitivity and accuracy rates for diagnosing coronary artery stenosis were consistently > 89.6 percent.
Can CT-Based Deep Learning Bolster Prognostic Assessments of Ground-Glass Nodules?
June 19th 2025Emerging research shows that a multiple time-series deep learning model assessment of CT images provides 20 percent higher sensitivity than a delta radiomic model and 56 percent higher sensitivity than a clinical model for prognostic evaluation of ground-glass nodules.
