A rule aid comprising seven factors may aid physicians in deciding whether to refer children for abdominal CT scans following blunt trauma to the abdomen.
A rule aid comprising seven factors may aid physicians in deciding whether to refer children for abdominal CT scans following blunt trauma to the abdomen, say researchers in a study published today the Annals of Emergency Medicine.
Concern of radiation emitted from CT scans has long led to worries regarding radiation risk among children. “We have now identified a population of pediatric patients that does not typically benefit from a CT scan, which is an important step in reducing radiation exposure,” James Holmes, principal investigator, said in a press release. Holmes is a professor of emergency medicine at the UC Davis School of Medicine.
Using the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN), researchers looked at more than 12,000 children who presented in an ER following blunt trauma to the torso, such as sustained from a car or bicycle crash, a fall, or an assault. The researchers evaluated several factors, including evidence of trauma on the abdomen or chest, neurological changes, abdominal pain, or tenderness, abnormal breath sounds, and vomiting. These became the seven factors for the rule aid.
Results showed that majority of children who did not show evidence of these factors would not have benefitted from undergoing an abdominal CT scan. Only 0.01 percent of the children were found to have an abdominal injury that required acute intervention. The risk from developing future cancer from radiation exposure would be greater than the presenting problem, the authors said.
This prediction rule is not meant to be the sole basis on which to determine if a CT scan is required, but as a tool to help the rule out when CTs would be least likely to be helpful in diagnosis and management. The authors emphasized that clinical judgment plays a critical role in determining whether a CT is needed.
Further testing of the prediction rule is required before it is adopted for use in the emergency rooms.
Can CT-Based AI Provide Automated Detection of Colorectal Cancer?
February 14th 2025For the assessment of contrast-enhanced abdominopelvic CT exams, an artificial intelligence model demonstrated equivalent or better sensitivity than radiologist readers, and greater than 90 percent specificity for the diagnosis of colorectal cancer.
Key Chest CT Parameters for Body Composition May be Prognostic for Patients with Resectable NSCLC
February 11th 2025A high intermuscular adipose index has a 49 percent increased likelihood of being associated with lower overall survival in patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), according to new research.
The Reading Room: Racial and Ethnic Minorities, Cancer Screenings, and COVID-19
November 3rd 2020In this podcast episode, Dr. Shalom Kalnicki, from Montefiore and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, discusses the disparities minority patients face with cancer screenings and what can be done to increase access during the pandemic.
Comparative AI Study Shows Merits of RapidAI LVO Software in Stroke Detection
February 6th 2025The Rapid LVO AI software detected 33 percent more cases of large vessel occlusion (LVO) on computed tomography angiography (CTA) than Viz LVO AI software, according to a new comparative study presented at the International Stroke Conference (ISC).
New CT Angiography Study Shows Impact of COVID-19 on Coronary Inflammation and Plaque
February 5th 2025Prior COVID-19 infection was associated with a 28 percent higher progression of total percent atheroma volume (PAV) annually and over a 5 percent higher incidence of high-risk plaque in patients with coronary artery lesions, according to CCTA findings from a new study.