In radiology, being clueless, like being ignorant, can be bliss.
Every now and then, I’ll be talking with someone outside of the healthcare industry, or even within it but external to radiology, and the question will come up: How much does an X-ray cost? An ultrasound? CT? MRI?
The most honest and succinct answer I can usually offer is “I don’t know.” If I know the other individual well enough, I might punctuate this seemingly-bizarre ignorance of my own livelihood with a “duh” worthy of Moose from the Archie comics. I can tell you that most of the other docs I know would have little to add.
If one is unable to even vaguely estimate the value of a particular good or service, there are a few possible implications: he thinks its value is beyond measure (priceless), he thinks it is negligible (worthless) or he is insufficiently familiar with the subject (clueless).
Being clueless is generally not a formula for success in running a business. If a venture is to financially survive, let alone thrive, it has to live within its means. Rising overhead requires adaptive responses like reducing voluntary expenses, passing on costs to customers with raised prices, etc. Just imagine a business trying to do this without a knowledge of what price-tag is attached to its goods and services.
And yet, that’s exactly the way it is in healthcare, and in specialties like radiology in particular. Forget about the minority of docs who have achieved positions high on their respective chains of command who actually get to negotiate with insurers, hospitals, etc. regarding terms of coverage…I’m talking about those of us actually doing the lion’s share of the work.
[[{"type":"media","view_mode":"media_crop","fid":"25889","attributes":{"alt":"","class":"media-image media-image-right","id":"media_crop_5395335492212","media_crop_h":"0","media_crop_image_style":"-1","media_crop_instance":"2434","media_crop_rotate":"0","media_crop_scale_h":"0","media_crop_scale_w":"0","media_crop_w":"0","media_crop_x":"0","media_crop_y":"0","style":"margin: 1px; border-style: solid; line-height: 1.538em; height: 150px; width: 150px; float: right;","title":" ","typeof":"foaf:Image"}}]]
I’ve seen docs play mind games with themselves regarding how much they, personally, are getting for their work. Dividing salary by number of hours worked, for instance, or by the number of cases they’ve done. But this is just rehashing the financial relationship between the docs and their employers; it doesn’t get at the actual cost (or value) of the services being provided.
Occasionally, you’ll see someone in our field trying to educate himself on the subject, but this is often aborted upon discovery that the information is hardly easy to find, let alone displayed publically in a simple, straightforward format for all to see and comprehend. Further, all details are subject to change without notice or predictability by the “Powers That Be.”
Many find it easier (and more comfortable) to save their time and trouble for other pursuits. Especially if previous efforts at self-enlightenment have revealed that, even when you understand the nuts and bolts of the system, you have no ability to do anything about it…the government or your insurers are able to unilaterally tell you that you will now get 50 percent of what you used to for your work, and all your understanding does is allow you to recognize just how raw a deal you are getting. Willful cluelessness, as with ignorance in other circumstances, can be bliss.
Where Things Stand with the Radiologist Shortage
June 18th 2025A new report conveys the cumulative impact of ongoing challenges with radiologist residency positions, reimbursement, post-COVID-19 attrition rates and the aging of the population upon the persistent shortage of radiologists in the United States.
How to Successfully Launch a CCTA Program at Your Hospital or Practice
June 11th 2025Emphasizing increasing recognition of the capability of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) for the evaluation of acute and stable chest pain, this author defuses common misperceptions and reviews key considerations for implementation of a CCTA program.
The Reading Room: Artificial Intelligence: What RSNA 2020 Offered, and What 2021 Could Bring
December 5th 2020Nina Kottler, M.D., chief medical officer of AI at Radiology Partners, discusses, during RSNA 2020, what new developments the annual meeting provided about these technologies, sessions to access, and what to expect in the coming year.
Mammography AI Platform for Five-Year Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Gets FDA De Novo Authorization
June 2nd 2025Through AI recognition of subtle patterns in breast tissue on screening mammograms, the Clairity Breast software reportedly provides validated risk scoring for predicting one’s five-year risk of breast cancer.