In radiology, being clueless, like being ignorant, can be bliss.
Every now and then, I’ll be talking with someone outside of the healthcare industry, or even within it but external to radiology, and the question will come up: How much does an X-ray cost? An ultrasound? CT? MRI?
The most honest and succinct answer I can usually offer is “I don’t know.” If I know the other individual well enough, I might punctuate this seemingly-bizarre ignorance of my own livelihood with a “duh” worthy of Moose from the Archie comics. I can tell you that most of the other docs I know would have little to add.
If one is unable to even vaguely estimate the value of a particular good or service, there are a few possible implications: he thinks its value is beyond measure (priceless), he thinks it is negligible (worthless) or he is insufficiently familiar with the subject (clueless).
Being clueless is generally not a formula for success in running a business. If a venture is to financially survive, let alone thrive, it has to live within its means. Rising overhead requires adaptive responses like reducing voluntary expenses, passing on costs to customers with raised prices, etc. Just imagine a business trying to do this without a knowledge of what price-tag is attached to its goods and services.
And yet, that’s exactly the way it is in healthcare, and in specialties like radiology in particular. Forget about the minority of docs who have achieved positions high on their respective chains of command who actually get to negotiate with insurers, hospitals, etc. regarding terms of coverage…I’m talking about those of us actually doing the lion’s share of the work.
[[{"type":"media","view_mode":"media_crop","fid":"25889","attributes":{"alt":"","class":"media-image media-image-right","id":"media_crop_5395335492212","media_crop_h":"0","media_crop_image_style":"-1","media_crop_instance":"2434","media_crop_rotate":"0","media_crop_scale_h":"0","media_crop_scale_w":"0","media_crop_w":"0","media_crop_x":"0","media_crop_y":"0","style":"margin: 1px; border-style: solid; line-height: 1.538em; height: 150px; width: 150px; float: right;","title":" ","typeof":"foaf:Image"}}]]
I’ve seen docs play mind games with themselves regarding how much they, personally, are getting for their work. Dividing salary by number of hours worked, for instance, or by the number of cases they’ve done. But this is just rehashing the financial relationship between the docs and their employers; it doesn’t get at the actual cost (or value) of the services being provided.
Occasionally, you’ll see someone in our field trying to educate himself on the subject, but this is often aborted upon discovery that the information is hardly easy to find, let alone displayed publically in a simple, straightforward format for all to see and comprehend. Further, all details are subject to change without notice or predictability by the “Powers That Be.”
Many find it easier (and more comfortable) to save their time and trouble for other pursuits. Especially if previous efforts at self-enlightenment have revealed that, even when you understand the nuts and bolts of the system, you have no ability to do anything about it…the government or your insurers are able to unilaterally tell you that you will now get 50 percent of what you used to for your work, and all your understanding does is allow you to recognize just how raw a deal you are getting. Willful cluelessness, as with ignorance in other circumstances, can be bliss.
Burnout in Radiology: Key Risk Factors and Promising Solutions
June 9th 2025Recognizing the daunting combination of increasing imaging volume and workforce shortages, these authors discuss key risk factors contributing to burnout and moral injury in radiology, and potential solutions to help preserve well-being among radiologists.
Mammography AI Platform for Five-Year Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Gets FDA De Novo Authorization
June 2nd 2025Through AI recognition of subtle patterns in breast tissue on screening mammograms, the Clairity Breast software reportedly provides validated risk scoring for predicting one’s five-year risk of breast cancer.
The Reading Room: Artificial Intelligence: What RSNA 2020 Offered, and What 2021 Could Bring
December 5th 2020Nina Kottler, M.D., chief medical officer of AI at Radiology Partners, discusses, during RSNA 2020, what new developments the annual meeting provided about these technologies, sessions to access, and what to expect in the coming year.
Can Emerging AI Software Offer Detection of CAD on CCTA on Par with Radiologists?
May 14th 2025In a study involving over 1,000 patients who had coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) exams, AI software demonstrated a 90 percent AUC for assessments of cases > CAD-RADS 3 and 4A and had a 98 percent NPV for obstructive coronary artery disease.
Could AI-Powered Abbreviated MRI Reinvent Detection for Structural Abnormalities of the Knee?
April 24th 2025Employing deep learning image reconstruction, parallel imaging and multi-slice acceleration in a sub-five-minute 3T knee MRI, researchers noted 100 percent sensitivity and 99 percent specificity for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears.