Vendors are pouring money into R&D aimed at reducing radiation dose to patients when a simpler, more immediate answer might be at hand: positioning patients correctly before scanning.
Vendors are pouring money into R&D aimed at reducing radiation dose to patients when a simpler, more immediate answer might be at hand: positioning patients correctly before scanning.
Research conducted at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston suggests that the vast majority of patients undergoing CT may be exposed to much more radiation than needed because technologists don't center them appropriately on the scanner gantry table. Proper positioning can reduce radiation dose by as much as 56%, according to the MGH research.
The researchers' conclusions are based on a study of 63 CT patients. Forty-two of the 45 patients undergoing abdominal CTs and all of the 18 patients undergoing chest CT were found to be off center, according to Dr. Mannudeep Kalra, a radiology fellow at MGH in Boston.
As part of the study, the 63 patients were positioned on the scanner gantry table by a radiology technologist following standard department protocol. An x-ray was taken of the initial positioning of the patient. The CT scanner's laser guidance system estimated the point where the patient would be centered on the gantry table. The researchers then used an automatic centering technique to determine the true center point.
Patients were off center by 5.5 mm to as much as 64 mm for chest CT examinations and from 5.5 mm to 56 mm for abdominal CT exams, he said.
When the automatic centering technique was used to center the patients appropriately, radiation dose was cut anywhere from 7% to 29.9% in chest CT examinations and 5.5% to 56% for abdominal CT exams, he said.
"This study emphasizes that radiologists and technologists must pay close attention to patient centering," Kalra said. "In addition, vendors are encouraged to develop and assess techniques that aid the technologist in accurate patient centering."
Could AI-Powered Abbreviated MRI Reinvent Detection for Structural Abnormalities of the Knee?
April 24th 2025Employing deep learning image reconstruction, parallel imaging and multi-slice acceleration in a sub-five-minute 3T knee MRI, researchers noted 100 percent sensitivity and 99 percent specificity for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears.
Meta-Analysis Shows Merits of AI with CTA Detection of Coronary Artery Stenosis and Calcified Plaque
April 16th 2025Artificial intelligence demonstrated higher AUC, sensitivity, and specificity than radiologists for detecting coronary artery stenosis > 50 percent on computed tomography angiography (CTA), according to a new 17-study meta-analysis.
Can CT-Based AI Radiomics Enhance Prediction of Recurrence-Free Survival for Non-Metastatic ccRCC?
April 14th 2025In comparison to a model based on clinicopathological risk factors, a CT radiomics-based machine learning model offered greater than a 10 percent higher AUC for predicting five-year recurrence-free survival in patients with non-metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC).