- AI
- Molecular Imaging
- CT
- X-Ray
- Ultrasound
- MRI
- Facility Management
- Mammography
Emerging PSMA Radioligand Therapy Shows Benefits for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
The PSMA-targeted modality 177Lu-PNT2002 improved radiographic progression-free survival by 29 percent in patients with mCRPC in comparison to ARPI therapy, according to new phase 3 trial data presented at the ESMO Congress in Spain.
Emerging research presented at the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) Congress suggests that the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted radioligand therapy 177Lu-PNT2002 offers significant advantages over androgen-receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI) treatment of PSMA-positive patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).
In the SPLASH phase 3 randomized trial, researchers compared the administration of 177Lu-PNT2002 (6.8 GBq every eight weeks for up to four treatment cycles) to ARPI therapies (abiraterone and enzalutamide) in 412 patients with mCRPC.1
The researchers found that 177Lu-PNT2002 (Lantheus) bolstered radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) by 29 percent and led to a 3.5 month increase in median rPFS (9.5 months vs. 6.5 months) in contrast to ARPI therapy.1,2
The use of the radioligand therapy 177Lu-PNT2002 was also associated with a longer median duration of response (9.4 months vs. 7.3 months), more than double the PSA50 response rate (35.7 percent vs. 14.6 percent) and longer median biochemical progression-free survival (seven months vs. 3.9 months) in comparison to ARPI modalities, according to the study authors.2
In recent phase 3 trial research presented at the ESMO Congress 2024, researchers found that the PSMA-targeted radioligand 177Lu-PNT2002 offered significantly improved median radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS) and treatment duration response in comparison to androgen-receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI) treatment of PSMA-positive patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).
“These initial data underscore the importance of PSMA-targeted RLTs, including 177Lu-PNT2002, as potential treatment options for patients who have limited choices after progressing on ARPI therapy,”noted Oliver Sartor, M.D., the director of radiopharmaceutical trials and a professor of medical oncology at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota.
(Editor's note: For related content on imaging for prostate cancer, click here.)
The researchers also pointed out that 177Lu-PNT2002 had lower safety risks than ARPI therapy. Specifically, patients in the 177Lu-PNT2002 cohort had a lower rate of treatment-related serious adverse events (AEs) (2.2 percent vs. 3.8 percent). The study authors said those who had 177Lu-PNT2002 had a greater than threefold lower rate of halted or reduced treatment due to treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in comparison to patients who had ARPI therapy (3 percent vs. 11.5 percent).1,2
References
1. Lantheus. Lantheus presents results from the primary analysis of phase 3 pivotal SPLASH trial in PSMA-positive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer during ESMO Congress 2024. Available at: https://investor.lantheus.com/news-releases/news-release-details/lantheus-presents-results-primary-analysis-phase-3-pivotal . Published September 15, 2024. Accessed September 16, 2024.
2. Sartor O, Jiang DM, Smoragiewicz M, et al. Efficacy of 177LU-PNT2002 in PSMA-positive mCRPC following progression on an androgen-receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI) (SPLASH). Presented at the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Congress September 13-17, 2024, Barcelona, Spain. Available at: https://cslide.ctimeetingtech.com/esmo2024/attendee/confcal/session/list? . Accessed September 16, 2024.
Study Shows MRI-Targeted Biopsies Reduce Overdiagnosis of Clinically Insignificant PCa by 57 Percent
September 27th 2024Omitting biopsy procedures in men with PSA levels > 3 ng/ml and negative MRI findings for prostate cancer (PCa) was associated with significantly lower risks of diagnosing clinically insignificant PCa in comparison to the use of systematic biopsy, according to an approximately four-year study of over 13,000 men who had prostate cancer screening.
PSMA PET/CT or mpMRI: Which is Better for Diagnosing Biochemical Recurrence of PCa?
September 24th 2024A new meta-analysis found that PSMA PET/CT offers a 12 percent higher positivity rate for detecting biochemical recurrence of PCa and a 19 percent higher positivity rate for identifying lymph node metastasis in comparison to mpMRI.
