Beginning next month, medical scientists funded by the National Institutes of Health will be asked to voluntarily submit final manuscripts describing their research to the PubMed Central online medical archive.
Beginning next month, medical scientists funded by the National Institutes of Health will be asked to voluntarily submit final manuscripts describing their research to the PubMed Central online medical archive.
The NIH Public Access Policy will apply to all manuscripts accepted for publication resulting from research supported entirely or in part by the NIH, according to a press release issued by the institutes.
The move could have far-reaching effects on medical research and the evolution of medical literature accessible on the Internet. Medical societies that sponsor peer-reviewed publications have increasingly turned to for-profit publishers such as Springer, Wiley, and Elsevier Science to manage their online publication services. Subscriptions costs for these journals are often several hundred dollars per year. The cost to download an article can be as high as $30.
"This represents a philosophy of information dissemination for the public good which is in contrast with protecting one's results for the purpose of being singularly credited with the findings of that particular research," said Dr. Douglas Beall, an associate professor of radiology at the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center.
The public access policy will cover such funding as:
In the release, the government strongly urged authors to submit accepted papers early in the publication process; preferably, within 12 months of the official final publication date.
The electronic age has increased the availability of information and the speed with which it can be accessed. Online publication of government-funded research should benefit physicians, researchers, and the public and may shape future research efforts by allowing the most current information to be included in manuscripts as they are written, Beall said.
The need for speed fostered by electronic availability of information may have its own set of problems, however.
"Pressure to make manuscripts available to conduct prompt peer reviews has the potential to cause evaluation speed to be placed at a higher priority than evaluation accuracy. The thoughtfulness and meticulous evaluation of manuscripts must be emphasized equally as much as the speed by which the manuscripts are evaluated," Beall said.
For more information from the online Diagnostic Imaging archives:
Publication lags presentation at RSNA meeting
Stay at the forefront of radiology with the Diagnostic Imaging newsletter, delivering the latest news, clinical insights, and imaging advancements for today’s radiologists.
The Reading Room Podcast: A Closer Look at Remote MRI Safety, Part 2
July 25th 2025In the second of a multi-part podcast episode, Emanuel Kanal, M.D. and Tobias Gilk, MRSO, MRSE, share their perspectives on remote MRI safety protocols for ensuring screening accuracy and adherence to conditional implant guidelines as well as a rapid and effective response to adverse events.
The Reading Room Podcast: Current and Emerging Insights on Abbreviated Breast MRI, Part 2
July 23rd 2025In the second part of a multi-part podcast episode, Stamatia Destounis, MD, Emily Conant, MD and Habib Rahbar, MD, discuss key sequences for abbreviated breast MRI and how it stacks up to other breast cancer screening modalities.
Chest CT for Post-COVID-19 Abnormalities: Nine Takeaways from a Multi-Society Consensus Statement
July 22nd 2025Developed by 21 thoracic radiologists, the new international consensus statement addresses appropriate indications, scan acquisition and keys to reporting for the use of chest CT imaging in evaluating for residual lung abnormalities from COVID-19.