In the fourth of a four-part series, Medical Management Professionals Inc.'s Jeff Fowler gives advice on selecting a revenue cycle management partner.
Increased regulations and higher fixed costs have many private radiology clinics across the U.S. choosing to affiliate with local hospitals or healthcare systems. Doing so, however, has raised new questions on the revenue side. Does it become easier or more difficult for a radiology practice to maximize its financial efficiency once it joins a larger healthcare system? What are the pitfalls - and the opportunities?
In this four-part series, representatives from Medical Management Professionals Inc., an Atlanta-based company that partners with ZirMed to provide billing services and revenue cycle management and practice management solutions to hospital-based doctors and practices, discuss operations, HIPAA 5010 and ICD-10 implementation, industry changes, and selection of an RCM partner.
Here, MMP’s Jeff Fowler talks about choosing an RCM partner.
What can a revenue cycle management partner provide that a purely in-house billing department can’t?
An RCM partner can provide overall industry expertise and depth of resources that a stand-alone practice does not have access to. It can also provide economies of scale by acquiring new technologies and looking for ways to improve efficiencies; an individual practice simply cannot afford to do that or does not have the ability to invest in it.
How does your company quantify the efficiencies that an RCM partner brings - for example, fewer denied claims and lower accounts receivables?
Historically, an RCM partner will improve revenues by at least 3 to 5 percent, net of billing costs. This is due to improvements in all phases of the billing process - from implementing extensive charge capture processes, to improved coding and faster claim submission, to advanced denial management tools, streamlined payment processing, and focused A/R follow-up, etc.
What do you tell radiology practices they should look for in an RCM partner?
Practices should seek a company with extensive radiology billing expertise that is using the latest industry standard radiology-specific billing technology. As well, an RCM partner should have professionals on staff who can provide the individual client service and feedback needed for a group to be successful. Extensive reporting tools and easy access to data are also critical in today’s environment.
Jeff Fowler is a director of client development with Medical Management Professionals, Inc. (MMP) in its East and South regions. Fowler has more than 20 years of expertise in the healthcare industry and possesses work experience in healthcare information systems and practice management services. He graduated from the University of the South (Sewanee).
Click here for Part 1 of this Q&A series on practice operations.
Click here for Part 2 of this Q&A serioes on HIPAA 5010 and ICD-10.
Click here for Part 3 of this Q&A series on changes in the imaging industry.
A Victory for Radiology: New CMS Proposal Would Provide Coverage of CT Colonography in 2025
July 12th 2024In newly issued proposals addressing changes to coverage for Medicare services in 2025, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) announced its intent to provide coverage of computed tomography colonography (CTC) for Medicare beneficiaries in 2025.
The Reading Room: Artificial Intelligence: What RSNA 2020 Offered, and What 2021 Could Bring
December 5th 2020Nina Kottler, M.D., chief medical officer of AI at Radiology Partners, discusses, during RSNA 2020, what new developments the annual meeting provided about these technologies, sessions to access, and what to expect in the coming year.
ACR Collaborative Model Leads to 35 Percent Improvement with Mammography Positioning Criteria
July 1st 2024Noting significant variation with facilities for achieving passing criteria for mammography positioning, researchers found that structured interventions, ranging from weekly auditing of images taken by technologists to mechanisms for feedback from radiologists to technologists, led to significant improvements in a multicenter study.
New Study Shows Non-Radiologists Interpreting 28 Percent of Imaging for Medicare Patients
June 28th 2024While radiologists interpreted approximately 99 percent of all non-cardiac CT, MRI and nuclear medicine studies in hospital and emergency department settings for Medicare beneficiaries, new research shows significantly less radiologist review of cardiac imaging and office-based imaging.