Interventions targeting radiologist factors may help reduce unwarranted variation in screening recalls.
Radiologist annual reading volume and experience affects mammography screening recall rates, according to a study published in the Journal of the American College of Radiology.
Researchers from Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston, Mass., undertook a retrospective study to evaluate patient, radiologist, and examination characteristics affecting screening mammography recall rates and to identify modifiable factors that could reduce recall variation.
The researchers reviewed screening mammographic examinations in female patients interpreted by 13 breast imaging specialists at an academic center and two outpatient centers from October 1, 2012, to May 31, 2015. The researchers looked at BI-RADS assignment, and current and prior screening examination findings. Radiologists’ annual screening volumes, clinical experience, and concentration in breast imaging were calculated, and risk aversion, stress from uncertainty, and malpractice concerns were derived via survey.
The results showed that 5,678 of 61,198 screening examinations (9.3 percent) were recalled. Patient and radiologist characteristics associated with higher odds of recall included:
• Patient’s age younger than 50 years
• Prior mammographic findings
• Calcification
• Mass
• Higher density category
• Baseline examination
• Annual reading volume of fewer than 1,250 examinations
• Fewer than 10 years of experience
Radiologist’s risk aversion, stress from uncertainty, malpractice concerns, and cancer detection rates were not associated with higher recall rates.
The researchers concluded that interventions targeting radiologist factors may help reduce unwarranted variation in screening recall.
Female Representation in Radiology: Where Things Stand
March 25th 2024Women comprise nearly 80 percent of breast imaging departments and 45 percent of pediatric radiology departments at academic institutions, but burnout, the COVID-19 pandemic and discrimination have impeded further progress in radiology, according to a recently published literature review.
Five Insights on Artifacts and Limitations with Contrast-Enhanced Mammography
February 29th 2024Noting that technique issues, patient positioning miscues and atypical features can all contribute to faulty interpretation with contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM), researchers at the European Congress of Radiology shared their insights on navigating artifacts and limitations with CEM.