Lack of pertinent clinical patient data is a critical element limiting the accuracy of radiologic interpretation.
Lack of pertinent clinical patient data is a critical element limiting the accuracy of radiologic interpretation.
A recent paper addresses radiologists' perceived need for additional clinical patient data, both at the time of interpretation and in follow-up of imaging examinations (J Digit Imaging 2008 May 6 [Epub ahead of print]).
"The majority of academic radiologists are dissatisfied with their ability to access clinical patient information at the time of interpretation," said Dr. William W. Boonn of the radiology department at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania.
Boonn noted that, although most radiologists place a high priority on obtaining this information, a number of factors discourage its widespread use in routine practice. Current mechanisms for monitoring necessary patient follow-up are inadequate, he said.
Boonn surveyed 139 academic radiology attendings, residents, and fellows, 72% of whom reported they frequently needed more clinical information than they received. Over 87% said that this additional information could change or modify their interpretive report.
"In many hospitals, several different information systems may be used to access clinical data, presenting challenges to the radiologist in the form of multiple login requirements and unfamiliar user interfaces," Boonn said.
Legacy systems may challenge information technology staff attempting to integrate these systems due to nonstandard proprietary interfaces.
"Although many hospitals now provide access to patient electronic medical records, often these systems are not readily available to the radiologist at the time of the exam," Boonn said.
Even if this information is available in the reading room, time constraints on the radiologist do not allow efficient review of clinical data, he said.
Boonn's findings suggest that systems could be designed to retrieve and organize patient clinical data from other hospital information systems and then display these data for the radiologist at the time of interpretation.
Specific patient data could be electronically targeted, for example, for retrieval at the time of exam and collected for review along with the study, Boonn said.
"Almost all radiologists indicated they would use this type of system," he said. "The majority felt it would make a significant impact in the quality of their interpretations."
Another deficiency in academic radiology practice exposed in the survey is the lack of ability to follow up on previously interpreted exams.
Most radiologists rely on memory or keep a handwritten log, suggesting that the quality of patient care could be improved by a software mechanism to set flags or reminders that would alert the radiologist later that follow-up is available.
"In the maze of subspecialists who care for a patient, this reminder would help provide additional safeguards that crucial follow-up is addressed," Boonn said.
Can MRI-Guided Transurethral Ultrasound Ablation Have an Impact for Localized Prostate Cancer?
December 11th 2023Follow-up MRI imaging one year after transurethral ultrasound ablation revealed approximately 50 percent decreases in prostate volume and median PSA density, according to recently presented research findings at the 2023 Society of Urologic Oncology (SUO) Annual Meeting.
What a New Mammography Study Reveals About BMI, Race, Ethnicity and Advanced Breast Cancer Risk
December 8th 2023In a new study examining population attributable risk proportions (PARPs) based on data from over three million screening mammography exams, researchers found that postmenopausal Black women had the highest BMI-related PARP and premenopausal Asian and Pacific Islander women had the highest breast density-related PARP for advanced breast cancer.
Study: Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Changes Surgical Plan in 22.5 Percent of Breast Cancer Cases
December 7th 2023Contrast-enhanced mammography detected additional lesions in 43 percent of patients and led to additional biopsies in 18.2 percent of patients, over half of whom had malignant lesions, according to a study of over 500 women presented at the recent Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) conference.
What a New Study Reveals About Adjunctive DBT and Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancer
December 6th 2023The combination of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and digital mammography had a 21.6 higher invasive breast cancer detection rate for stage 1 tumors than digital mammography alone, according to a new study involving nearly 100,000 women.