• AI
  • Molecular Imaging
  • CT
  • X-Ray
  • Ultrasound
  • MRI
  • Facility Management
  • Mammography

Radiologists Not Always Compensated for Emergency Department Services

Article

Emergency department radiology services frequently are uncompensated among both uninsured and insured patients.

Radiologists in emergency departments (EDs) are uncompensated for over 28 percent of their services, according to a study published in the Journal of the American College of Radiology.

After a period of considerable growth, medical imaging utilization has slowed or declined in all settings except the ED, where the volume of such services, particularly CTs, continues to increase. Researchers from the Harvey L. Neiman Health Policy Institute in Reston, Va., performed a retrospective study of administrative claims data from 2009 to 2012 in order to examine the characteristics of uncompensated services rendered by radiologists in the ED.

The researchers identified billing claims for 2,935 radiologists who rendered 18,475,491 services to ED patients from 2009 to 2012. Of the 830 types of procedures performed, the study focused on 133, which comprised 99.0 percent (18,296,734) of all the rendered services. The Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (MPFS) was used as the basis for uniform dollar valuation for the services.

According to the findings, 96.6 percent of the radiologists (2,835) provided uncompensated care to ED patients. This added up to an average of $2,584 in professional services per physician per service month.

The most common procedures, comprising 98.3 percent of all imaging were radiography, CT and ultrasound.

 
Number of procedures
Percentage
Radiography
10,664,437
58.3
CT
5,701,654
31.2
Ultrasound
1,615,578
8.8
MRI
172,182
0.9
Interventional radiology
81,185
0.4
Mammography
4,833
0.01

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The most commonly used services were:

1.   Chest radiography, one view

2.   Chest radiography, two views

3.   CT brain, without contrast

4.   CT abdomen and pelvis, with contrast

5.   CT abdomen and pelvis, without contrast

6.   CT cervical spine, without contrast

7.   Foot radiography, three or more views

8.   Ankle radiography, three or more views

Although CTs were number two on the frequency list, CTs were responsible for 64.8 percent of the uncompensated dollars.

 “Of all 18,296,734 services studied, 15,409,345 (84.2 percent) were rendered to insured patients,” the authors wrote. “Of those, 2,480,226 (16.1 percent) were uncompensated. Of the 2,887,389 (15.8 percent) services rendered to the uninsured, 2,714,506 (94.0 percent) were uncompensated.”

In the study discussion, the authors expressed surprise in learning that almost half of uncompensated cases were for patients who did have insurance. Possible explanations include incomplete documented reports resulting in insurance denials and an increasing trend of insured patients being reluctant to make the “first pay” copayments to radiologists.

 

Related Videos
Improving the Quality of Breast MRI Acquisition and Processing
Does Initial CCTA Provide the Best Assessment of Stable Chest Pain?
Making the Case for Intravascular Ultrasound Use in Peripheral Vascular Interventions
Can Diffusion Microstructural Imaging Provide Insights into Long Covid Beyond Conventional MRI?
Emerging MRI and PET Research Reveals Link Between Visceral Abdominal Fat and Early Signs of Alzheimer’s Disease
Nina Kottler, MD, MS
The Executive Order on AI: Promising Development for Radiology or ‘HIPAA for AI’?
Practical Insights on CT and MRI Neuroimaging and Reporting for Stroke Patients
Related Content
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.