How is terminology between radiologists and primary care providers interpreted?
Most radiologists and primary care providers (PCSs) agree regarding significance of evaluated radiology terminology, according to a study published in the Journal of the American College of Radiology.
Researchers from Missouri and Massachusetts undertook a study to assess the lexicon used by radiologists and referring physicians, and their respective interpretations. Using an internal listserv, the researchers sent a survey to radiologists and PCPs, asking about their interpretation of the statistical likelihood of the presence of metastatic disease based upon the terminology used within a hypothetical radiology report. Ten common modifying terms were evaluated. Potential responses for the statistical likelihoods included:
• 0%to 25%
• 26% to 50%
• 51% to 75%
• 76% to 99%
•100%
The results showed that the “diagnostic for metastatic disease” and “represents metastatic disease” were selected by a high percentage of both groups as conferring a 100% likelihood of “true metastatic disease.”[[{"type":"media","view_mode":"media_crop","fid":"52042","attributes":{"alt":"Radiology terminology","class":"media-image media-image-right","id":"media_crop_4561102695746","media_crop_h":"0","media_crop_image_style":"-1","media_crop_instance":"6447","media_crop_rotate":"0","media_crop_scale_h":"0","media_crop_scale_w":"0","media_crop_w":"0","media_crop_x":"0","media_crop_y":"0","style":"height: 164px; width: 170px; border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 1px; float: right;","title":"©Modella/Shutterstock.com","typeof":"foaf:Image"}}]]
The phrases “cannot exclude metastatic disease” and “may represent metastatic disease” were selected by a high proportion of both groups as conferring a 0%likelihood of “true metastatic disease.” The radiologists assigned a higher statistical likelihood to the terms “diagnostic for metastatic disease”, “represents metastatic disease”, “suspicious for metastatic disease”, “consistent with metastatic disease”, and “compatible with metastatic disease” (P = .003).
The researchers concluded that a “qualitative agreement among radiologists and PCPs exists concerning the significance of the evaluated terminology, although radiologists assigned a higher statistical likelihood than PCPs for several phrases.”
Burnout in Radiology: Key Risk Factors and Promising Solutions
June 9th 2025Recognizing the daunting combination of increasing imaging volume and workforce shortages, these authors discuss key risk factors contributing to burnout and moral injury in radiology, and potential solutions to help preserve well-being among radiologists.
The Reading Room: Artificial Intelligence: What RSNA 2020 Offered, and What 2021 Could Bring
December 5th 2020Nina Kottler, M.D., chief medical officer of AI at Radiology Partners, discusses, during RSNA 2020, what new developments the annual meeting provided about these technologies, sessions to access, and what to expect in the coming year.
Mammography AI Platform for Five-Year Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Gets FDA De Novo Authorization
June 2nd 2025Through AI recognition of subtle patterns in breast tissue on screening mammograms, the Clairity Breast software reportedly provides validated risk scoring for predicting one’s five-year risk of breast cancer.