How is terminology between radiologists and primary care providers interpreted?
Most radiologists and primary care providers (PCSs) agree regarding significance of evaluated radiology terminology, according to a study published in the Journal of the American College of Radiology.
Researchers from Missouri and Massachusetts undertook a study to assess the lexicon used by radiologists and referring physicians, and their respective interpretations. Using an internal listserv, the researchers sent a survey to radiologists and PCPs, asking about their interpretation of the statistical likelihood of the presence of metastatic disease based upon the terminology used within a hypothetical radiology report. Ten common modifying terms were evaluated. Potential responses for the statistical likelihoods included:
• 0%to 25%
• 26% to 50%
• 51% to 75%
• 76% to 99%
•100%
The results showed that the “diagnostic for metastatic disease” and “represents metastatic disease” were selected by a high percentage of both groups as conferring a 100% likelihood of “true metastatic disease.”[[{"type":"media","view_mode":"media_crop","fid":"52042","attributes":{"alt":"Radiology terminology","class":"media-image media-image-right","id":"media_crop_4561102695746","media_crop_h":"0","media_crop_image_style":"-1","media_crop_instance":"6447","media_crop_rotate":"0","media_crop_scale_h":"0","media_crop_scale_w":"0","media_crop_w":"0","media_crop_x":"0","media_crop_y":"0","style":"height: 164px; width: 170px; border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 1px; float: right;","title":"©Modella/Shutterstock.com","typeof":"foaf:Image"}}]]
The phrases “cannot exclude metastatic disease” and “may represent metastatic disease” were selected by a high proportion of both groups as conferring a 0%likelihood of “true metastatic disease.” The radiologists assigned a higher statistical likelihood to the terms “diagnostic for metastatic disease”, “represents metastatic disease”, “suspicious for metastatic disease”, “consistent with metastatic disease”, and “compatible with metastatic disease” (P = .003).
The researchers concluded that a “qualitative agreement among radiologists and PCPs exists concerning the significance of the evaluated terminology, although radiologists assigned a higher statistical likelihood than PCPs for several phrases.”
A Victory for Radiology: New CMS Proposal Would Provide Coverage of CT Colonography in 2025
July 12th 2024In newly issued proposals addressing changes to coverage for Medicare services in 2025, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) announced its intent to provide coverage of computed tomography colonography (CTC) for Medicare beneficiaries in 2025.
The Reading Room: Artificial Intelligence: What RSNA 2020 Offered, and What 2021 Could Bring
December 5th 2020Nina Kottler, M.D., chief medical officer of AI at Radiology Partners, discusses, during RSNA 2020, what new developments the annual meeting provided about these technologies, sessions to access, and what to expect in the coming year.
ACR Collaborative Model Leads to 35 Percent Improvement with Mammography Positioning Criteria
July 1st 2024Noting significant variation with facilities for achieving passing criteria for mammography positioning, researchers found that structured interventions, ranging from weekly auditing of images taken by technologists to mechanisms for feedback from radiologists to technologists, led to significant improvements in a multicenter study.
New Study Shows Non-Radiologists Interpreting 28 Percent of Imaging for Medicare Patients
June 28th 2024While radiologists interpreted approximately 99 percent of all non-cardiac CT, MRI and nuclear medicine studies in hospital and emergency department settings for Medicare beneficiaries, new research shows significantly less radiologist review of cardiac imaging and office-based imaging.