National societies and individual institutions need to firm up guidelines governing the imaging of pregnant women, according to several presenters at a special focus session Wednesday.
National societies and individual institutions need to firm up guidelines governing the imaging of pregnant women, according to several presenters at a special focus session Wednesday.
"Welcome to the third rail of radiology," said Dr. Andrew LeRoy, a professor of radiology at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN.
LeRoy cited 2 a.m. arguments about how to deal with pregnant women who need some kind of imaging. One way to mitigate such disagreements is to establish firm protocols addressing a variety of imaging scenarios.
Dr. Louis Wagner, a professor of radiological physics at the University of Texas, opened up the session by outlining risk and dose issues. A fetus exposed to specific radiation doses may have increased risks for malformations, induced neoplasms such as leukemia, and induced terminations, according to Wagner.
"A rough estimate of risk is that one extra mortality and up to four extra cancers occur for every 1000 fetuses exposed to 100 mGy of radiation," he said. "Put another way, if you expose 1000 pregnant patients to a single CT pass, eight fetuses may go on to develop cancer, with two possibly dying from the cancer."
Wagner listed his own rules of radiation management:
At Mayo, LeRoy developed guidelines and a simple reference sheet to ameliorate those 2 a.m. disputes. In thinking about protocols for the pregnant patient, the department learned four different lessons:
LeRoy described several imaging protocols that had been changed to accommodate pregnant women. For appendicitis, he and his colleagues first turn to ultrasound, and if that is nondiagnostic, they go to MR. The protocol is not feasible, of course, for facilities that have no or limited access to MR equipment, he said.
Dr. Kimberley Applegate, an associate professor of radiology at the Indiana University School of Medicine, noted the surprising lack of literature regarding the topic of imaging pregnant or potentially pregnant women. The topic is a complicated one, encompassing different categories of patients: abdominal versus extra-abdominal imaging candidates, emergency versus scheduled imaging candidates, known pregnancies versus unsure/unknown, and minors versus adults.
Citing earlier research, Applegate said that approximately 1% of all pregnant women are given abdominal radiography during the first trimester of pregnancy.
In terms of screening and imaging protocols for pregnant patients, policies vary at institutions across the nation. Some have no written consent or screening questionnaire, some have the technologist ask all females from 12 to 52 years of age if they are pregnant, and others perform urine tests in those patients where pregnancy is unknown, she said.
Many are looking to the American College of Radiology to develop national guidelines to bring some uniformity to the process, Applegate said. Meanwhile, radiology departments can develop brochures informing pregnant women about the risks as well as the benefits of imaging. Facilities and organizations should update their Web sites to include imaging information for the pregnant patient.
Developing national guidelines and standards is no easy task. It will require collaboration between radiologists, clinicians, legal experts, and radiation risk experts, according to Applegate.
Can MRI-Based AI Bolster Biopsy Decision-Making in PI-RADS 3 Cases?
December 9th 2024In patients with PI-RADS 3 lesion assessments, the combination of AI and prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) level achieved a 78 percent sensitivity and 93 percent negative predictive value for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa), according to research presented at the Radiological Society of North American (RSNA) conference.
The Reading Room: Artificial Intelligence: What RSNA 2020 Offered, and What 2021 Could Bring
December 5th 2020Nina Kottler, M.D., chief medical officer of AI at Radiology Partners, discusses, during RSNA 2020, what new developments the annual meeting provided about these technologies, sessions to access, and what to expect in the coming year.
RSNA 2020: Addressing Healthcare Disparities and Access to Care
December 4th 2020Rich Heller, M.D., with Radiology Partners, and Lucy Spalluto, M.D., with Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, discuss the highlights of their RSNA 2020 session on health disparities, focusing on the underlying factors and challenges radiologists face to providing greater access to care.
New Interventional Radiology Research Shows Merits of Genicular Artery Embolization for Knee OA
December 3rd 2024In a cohort of over 160 patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA), including grade 4 in nearly half of the cases, genicular artery embolization led to an 87 percent improvement in the quality of life index, according to research presented at the recent RSNA conference.
Siemens Healthineers Debuts New Photon-Counting CT Systems at RSNA
December 2nd 2024Debuting at the Radiological Society of North American (RSNA) conference, the new photon-counting computed tomography (PPCT) scanners Naeotom Alpha.Pro and Naeotom Alpha.Prime reportedly combine rapid scan times with high-resolution precision.