Radiology residents who take phone calls in the reading room may become distracted, reducing their diagnostic accuracy.
Phone calls to on-call radiologists are distracting and may negatively affect diagnostic accuracy, according to a study published in the journal Academic Radiology.
Researchers from the Indiana University School of Medicine sought to determine if distractions, like telephone calls, in the radiology reading room affected the diagnostic accuracy of radiology residents during off-hour coverage.
The researchers identified phone call times and durations over a 13-month period by examining radiology resident discrepancy reports and reading room logs from an academic tertiary care pediatric hospital. The researchers identified major discrepancy shifts. These were defined as a call shift where at least one major discrepancy was discovered the following morning by the attending radiologist between the resident preliminary and attending final reports. They also identified dictation time stamps for each discrepant preliminary dictation recorded. The researchers then compared telephone call volume and preliminary report time stamps were either “discrepancy shifts” or “no discrepancy shifts.” Each call shift lasted 14 hours. In the morning, major discrepancies were logged.
The results showed that there were 51 major discrepancies in 41 shifts. Thirty-nine of these discrepancies had documented error details and resident preliminary report time stamps.
“The average number of telephone calls for the “discrepancy shifts” was slightly greater than the “no discrepancy shifts” (48.59 versus 44.02) but was not statistically significant,” the authors wrote. “However, there was a statistically significant increase in the average number of phone calls in the one hour preceding the generation of a discrepant preliminary report versus the “no discrepancy shifts” (4.23 versus 3.24 calls). One additional phone call during the hour preceding the generation of a discrepant preliminary report resulted in a 12% increased likelihood of a resident error.”
The researchers concluded that efforts should be made to limit distractions, such as phone calls, to reduce the risk of major discrepancies in image readings.
Shaping the Future of Radiology in 2025: Trends, Threats, and Opportunities
January 10th 2025How do we respond to challenges with staff recruitment, cybersecurity, and looming hospital takeovers in radiology? This author assesses key trends in radiology and offers key insights to stay competitive in the field.
Can MRI Have an Impact with Fertility-Sparing Treatments for Endometrial and Cervical Cancers?
January 9th 2025In a literature review that includes insights from recently issued guidelines from multiple European medical societies, researchers discuss the role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in facilitating appropriate patient selection for fertility-sparing treatments to address early-stage endometrial and cervical cancer.
Surveillance Breast MRI Associated with Lower Risks of Advanced Second Breast Cancers
January 8th 2025After propensity score matching in a study of over 3,000 women with a personal history of breast cancer, researchers found that surveillance breast MRI facilitated a 59 percent lower risk in advanced presentations of second breast cancers.