The Reading Room Podcast: Current Insights on Recent Research About Radiation-Induced Cancers with CT Scans, Part 1

Opinion
Podcast

In a new podcast, Mahadevappa Mahesh, MS, Ph.D., and Joseph Cavallo, M.D., share their perspectives on recently published research looking at projections for future radiation-induced cancers from computed tomography (CT) scans.

In a recently published study, researchers estimated that out of an estimated 93 million computed tomography (CT) exams performed in 2023, there may be 103,000 future cases of radiation-induced cancers. Based on current CT use and radiation dosing levels, the study authors suggested that radiation-induced cancers from CT exposure may account for 5 percent of all cancer cases.

However, in the first part of a new podcast, Joseph Cavallo, M.D., emphasized appropriate perspective with the aforementioned risk modeling study and taking all the risks into account to optimize patient care.

“I would have liked to see a little more discussion about underlying risk in general. They speak to the risk of CT, but we're really not comparing the risk of a CT versus the risk of doing nothing … Hopefully, in all the cases where we're doing CT or other radiation-based imaging, we should be comparing the risk of CT versus the risk of the underlying disease and the risk of complications from the underlying disease, and ultimately, the risk of missing the diagnosis of some of those diseases,” posited Dr. Cavallo, an assistant professor of radiology and biomedical imaging at Yale School of Medicine in Boston.

While the authors of the aforementioned study suggested that multiphase scanning, occurring in 28.5 percent of CT exams, is commonly overutilized, Mahadevappa Mahesh, MS, Ph.D., emphasized that patient history and disease presentation are key considerations.

“Which patients (had the multiphase scanning)? Was it necessary? Because it's very subjective to say overused. … Did any of them have cancer-related studies? Do they have other underlying diseases? (In these cases), you only (get) answers with a triphasic study. That's important to say. I'm not refuting the numbers, but the justification of these numbers is very important,” added Dr. Mahesh, the president of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM), and a professor of radiology and radiological sciences at the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine.

(Editor’s note: For related content, see “What New Research Reveals About Computed Tomography and Radiation-Induced Cancer Risk,” “Nine Takeaways from New Research on CT Scans and Radiation-Induced Cancers” and “AI Denoising Bolsters Ultra-Low-Dose CT Detection of Pneumonia Findings in Immunocompromised Adults.”)

For more insights from Dr. Cavallo and Dr. Mahesh, listen below or subscribe on your favorite podcast platform.

Recent Videos
Incorporating CT Colonography into Radiology Practice
What New Research Reveals About Computed Tomography and Radiation-Induced Cancer Risk
Can Deep Learning Provide a CT-Less Alternative for Attenuation Compensation with SPECT MPI?
Employing AI in Detecting Subdural Hematomas on Head CTs: An Interview with Jeremy Heit, MD, PhD
Pertinent Insights into the Imaging of Patients with Marfan Syndrome
Radiology Study Finds Increasing Rates of Non-Physician Practitioner Image Interpretation in Office Settings
Does Initial CCTA Provide the Best Assessment of Stable Chest Pain?
Nina Kottler, MD, MS
Practical Insights on CT and MRI Neuroimaging and Reporting for Stroke Patients
Related Content
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.