Readers with fewer than 10 years' experience benefit the most of adding DBT to 2D conventional screening mammography.
Adding digital breast tomosynthesis to conventional 2D screening mammography improves reading specificity, particularly for radiologists with less than 10 years experience. According to a retrospective study published in Radiology, all radiologists and advanced practitioner radiographers tested saw an improvement in reading specificity when digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) was used in conjunction with 2D screening mammography. Researchers analyzed data from the TOMMY trial, a comparison of tomosynthesis with digital mammography in the UK National Health Service Breast Screening Program. Nearly 8,900 women, ages 29 to 85, participated between July 2011 and March 2013. A data set of 7,060 was created and randomly allocated for independent, blinded review of 2D mammograms, DBT images and 2D mammograms, and synthetic 2D mammograms and DBT Images. Image readers didn't have access to previous images. Readers -- radiologists, advanced practitioner radiographers, and two breast clinicians -- had between 3-25 years of experience in the UK Breast Screening Program and had read between 5,000-13,000 cases annually. Ten years was the average experience level, and the average number of cases read annually was 8,000. Ten years' experiencee was used as the cutoff point for making reader performance comparisons. Data analysis revealed DBT addition improved reading specificity for everyone -- 56% vs 68% and 49% vs 67% for radiologists and advanced practitioner radiographer, respectively, and 46% vs. 55% for breast clinicians. Reading sensitivity improved for 19 of 24 readers and was significantly higher for those with less than 10 years' experience (91% vs. 86%) and for those with career mammographic of fewer than 80,000 cases.
AI-Initiated Recalls After Screening Mammography Demonstrate Higher PPV for Breast Cancer
March 18th 2025While recalls initiated by one of two reviewing radiologists after screening mammography were nearly 10 percent higher than recalls initiated by an AI software, the AI-initiated recalls had an 85 percent higher positive predictive value for breast cancer, according to a new study.
ECR Mammography Study: Pre-Op CEM Detects 34 Percent More Multifocal Masses than Mammography
February 28th 2025In addition to contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) demonstrating over a 90 percent detection rate for multifocal masses, researchers found that no significant difference between histological measurements and CEM, according to study findings presented at the European Congress of Radiology.
Study: Mammography AI Leads to 29 Percent Increase in Breast Cancer Detection
February 5th 2025Use of the mammography AI software had a nearly equivalent false positive rate as unassisted radiologist interpretation and resulted in a 44 percent reduction in screen reading workload, according to findings from a randomized controlled trial involving over 105,000 women.