Connecting with radiologists for virtual consults yields varying opinions from referrers, radiologists.
Physicians find virtual consults (VCs) with radiologists useful in many cases, but radiologists may find them disruptive to their workflow, according to a study published in the Journal of the American College of Radiology.
Researchers from Langone Medical Center in New York City, NY, performed a study to determine how physicians felt about a VC system that would allow them to consult with radiologists remotely.
The referrers directly accessed the VC through electronic medical records (EMRs) and used instant messaging to contact the appropriate subspecialist radiologist. The radiologist then accessed the VC through PACS. Along with the ability to communicate via the messaging service, both the referrer and the radiologist could view the radiologist’s PACS display through screen sharing. The radiologists’ and referrers’ feedback was evaluated after the institution’s first 110 VC sessions.
The results showed that this service was used most often by emergency physicians (27.3%) and those in internal medicine (13.6%). The radiologists’ most common subspecialties were abdominal (33.6%) and thoracic (16.4%) imaging. On average, the screen-shares lasted about 12 minutes.
The majority of referrers (80% to 90%) reported that the VC was easy to use. They also said that having access to VC was helpful in situations where location and time constraints made traditional consultation difficult, or if they needed a quick response for a targeted question. The referrers said that VC:[[{"type":"media","view_mode":"media_crop","fid":"48000","attributes":{"alt":"","class":"media-image media-image-right","id":"media_crop_3856503757490","media_crop_h":"0","media_crop_image_style":"-1","media_crop_instance":"5707","media_crop_rotate":"0","media_crop_scale_h":"0","media_crop_scale_w":"0","media_crop_w":"0","media_crop_x":"0","media_crop_y":"0","style":"height: 170px; width: 170px; border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 1px; float: right;","title":"©america365/Shutterstock.com","typeof":"foaf:Image"}}]]
• Was easy to use
• Improved their understanding of the radiology report
• Affected patient management
• Enhanced the radiologist’s role
However, although the referrers liked the VCs and the radiologists recognized referrers’ positive response to the system, the radiologists tended to view the VC as disruptive to their normal workflow.
Study: Use of Preoperative MRI 46 Percent Less Likely for Black Women with Breast Cancer
July 11th 2024In the study of over 1,400 women with breast cancer, researchers noted that Black women with dense breasts or lobular histology were significantly less likely to have preoperative MRI exams than White women with the same clinical characteristics.
The Reading Room: Artificial Intelligence: What RSNA 2020 Offered, and What 2021 Could Bring
December 5th 2020Nina Kottler, M.D., chief medical officer of AI at Radiology Partners, discusses, during RSNA 2020, what new developments the annual meeting provided about these technologies, sessions to access, and what to expect in the coming year.
Envisioning the Ideal Radiology Reading Room: Keys to Optimizing Form and Function
July 2nd 2024Emphasizing core concepts of sound ergonomics, accessibility, inclusivity, personalization, and convenient storage can help foster reading room environments with minimal distraction and optimal productivity.
ACR Collaborative Model Leads to 35 Percent Improvement with Mammography Positioning Criteria
July 1st 2024Noting significant variation with facilities for achieving passing criteria for mammography positioning, researchers found that structured interventions, ranging from weekly auditing of images taken by technologists to mechanisms for feedback from radiologists to technologists, led to significant improvements in a multicenter study.