Repeated digital mammography to screen for breast cancer may increase the risk for breast cancer.
Women with large breasts who undergo repeated screening mammography may be at higher risk for radiation-induced breast cancer and breast cancer death, according to a study published in the Annals of Internal Medicine.
Researchers from the United States and the Netherlands sought to determine radiation-induced breast cancer incidence and mortality in relation to repeated exposure to screening and diagnostic mammography and dose variation.
The researchers projected that annual digital mammographic screening of 100,000 women (aged 40 to 74) would induce 125 cases of breast cancer, and that there would be 16 deaths, relative to 968 breast cancer deaths that would have been averted by early detection from screening.
“Women exposed at the 95th percentile were projected to develop 246 cases of radiation-induced breast cancer leading to 32 deaths per 100,000 women,” the authors wrote.
Women with large breasts may require extra views for complete examination and this made up about8% of the population. These women were projected to have greater radiation-induced breast cancer risk of 266 cancer cases and 35 deaths per 100,000 women, compared with other women, who were projected to have 113 cancer cases and 15 deaths per 100,000 women. The researchers found that the risk for radiation-induced cancer was reduced five-fold when biennial screening began at age 50.[[{"type":"media","view_mode":"media_crop","fid":"45224","attributes":{"alt":"mammography","class":"media-image media-image-right","id":"media_crop_280844085558","media_crop_h":"0","media_crop_image_style":"-1","media_crop_instance":"5135","media_crop_rotate":"0","media_crop_scale_h":"0","media_crop_scale_w":"0","media_crop_w":"0","media_crop_x":"0","media_crop_y":"0","style":"height: 114px; width: 171px; border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 1px; float: right;","title":"©zlikovec/Shutterstock.com","typeof":"foaf:Image"}}]]
“[W]e estimate that the number of breast cancer cases induced by screening is probably very small, even for women with the greatest radiation exposures,” they wrote. “However, relative to the number of breast cancer deaths averted with screening, radiation-induced breast cancer incidence is not trivial. Most concerning are numbers projected for annual screening and screening before age 50 years of women with large breasts requiring extra views for complete examination, who have more than twice the risk for radiation-induced breast cancer as women with small or average-sized breasts.”
The authors concluded that both breast cancer incidence and mortality resulting from screening by digital mammography were affected by dose variability, resultant diagnostic work-up, initiation age, and screening frequency, possibly affecting women with large breasts more than other women. They encouraged radiologists to limit the number of views to as few as possible, particularly for women with large breasts.
Mammography and Breast MRI: Is it Time to Evaluate Strategies as Opposed to Modalities?
July 5th 2024The combination of mammography with breast MRI within 90 days had a 96.2 percent sensitivity in comparison to 48.1 percent for mammography and 79.7 percent for breast MRI performed within 91 to 270 days after index mammography, according to newly published research.
ACR Collaborative Model Leads to 35 Percent Improvement with Mammography Positioning Criteria
July 1st 2024Noting significant variation with facilities for achieving passing criteria for mammography positioning, researchers found that structured interventions, ranging from weekly auditing of images taken by technologists to mechanisms for feedback from radiologists to technologists, led to significant improvements in a multicenter study.