• AI
  • Molecular Imaging
  • CT
  • X-Ray
  • Ultrasound
  • MRI
  • Facility Management
  • Mammography

Report from SCAR: Patient CD-ROMs pose problem for PACS

Article

Over 10% of the image CDs patients bring from one hospital facility to another cannot be transferred onto a PACS, according to a study from the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center.

Over 10% of the image CDs patients bring from one hospital facility to another cannot be transferred onto a PACS, according to a study from the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center.

A poster presentation at the Society for Computer Applications in Radiology meeting in Orlando outlined the facility's experience dealing with outside images brought in by patients. The study covered a time period from July 2004 through May 2005.

Researchers led by Dr. Kevin McEnery, an associate professor of radiology, were able to load 1429 of 1641 discs, or 86.5%, into their PACS using an in-house software program designed to grab outside images from CDs. Patient CDs came from 49 states in the U.S., the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and 43 countries around the world.

Sixty percent of the rejected discs contained data that had been saved in a proprietary image data format that basically prevented any images from being viewed or pushed to the PACS.

The remaining 40% of the rejected discs contained commercial imaging formats such as JPEG and TIFF files. While these images could be viewed on a PC or a Web browser, they could not be seen as medical images and could not be ported to the PACS.

The investigators also studied the Integrating the Healthcare Eneterprise's portable data imaging integration file. They obtained 19 demonstration discs from the 2004 RSNA conference and successfully transferred all images from these discs to the PACS.

One problem posed by the variety of image CD-ROMs in circulation is the number of different ways in which they are labeled. For the study, these methods included:

  • 42.1% silk-screened discs

  • 38% handwritten (with Sharpie markers)

  • 8% automatically labeled by the CD-ROM-producing software

  • 11.1% unlabeled

With the various labeling methods, the investigators could not determine the origins of the handwritten and blank discs. These could have been produced by the originating hospital, or they could be copies made by the patients themselves.

Because a relatively significant number of CDs they received contained no DICOM data, the researchers recommended that centers that create these CDs instead of film should make sure that the imaging data is in the nonproprietary DICOM format.

For more stories from the Society for Computer Applications in Radiology meeting, go to the SCAR Webcast.

Related Videos
Improving the Quality of Breast MRI Acquisition and Processing
Can Fiber Optic RealShape (FORS) Technology Provide a Viable Alternative to X-Rays for Aortic Procedures?
Does Initial CCTA Provide the Best Assessment of Stable Chest Pain?
Making the Case for Intravascular Ultrasound Use in Peripheral Vascular Interventions
Can Diffusion Microstructural Imaging Provide Insights into Long Covid Beyond Conventional MRI?
Assessing the Impact of Radiology Workforce Shortages in Rural Communities
Emerging MRI and PET Research Reveals Link Between Visceral Abdominal Fat and Early Signs of Alzheimer’s Disease
Reimbursement Challenges in Radiology: An Interview with Richard Heller, MD
Nina Kottler, MD, MS
The Executive Order on AI: Promising Development for Radiology or ‘HIPAA for AI’?
Related Content
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.