FDG-PET/CT is gaining attention for its role in staging and restaging breast cancer. A trial from the Technical University of Munich, presented Sunday at the 2008 Society of Nuclear Medicine meeting in New Orleans, found that PET/CT detected local or distant recurrence in 67% of breast cancer patients and changed the management plan in 33% of the cases.
FDG-PET/CT is gaining attention for its role in staging and restaging breast cancer. A trial from the Technical University of Munich, presented Sunday at the 2008 Society of Nuclear Medicine meeting in New Orleans, found that PET/CT detected local or distant recurrence in 67% of breast cancer patients and changed the management plan in 33% of the cases. "We believe PET/CT has prognostic potential for restaging breast cancer," said presenter Dr. Michael Souvatzoglou of the nuclear medicine department.The prospective two-center study included 118 patients with suspected breast cancer recurrence on the basis of elevated tumor markers; abnormal MRI, CT, mammography, or ultrasound studies; or clinical signs. PET/CT results were correlated with patient management and outcomes.
PET/CT returned positive findings in 79 cases (67%). Local recurrence was identified in 12%, while metastases were diagnosed in 55%. Metastatic sites included:
Coregistered CT changed the anatomic location of the FDG-PET-detected lesions in 24 patients (20%), within either the same or a different organ or tissue.
Follow-up data on 87 patients showed that a change in therapeutic management was made based on PET/CT findings for 29 patients (33%). Changes included initiation of chemotherapy in 14, initiation of radiotherapy in 12, and initiation of chemoradiotherapy in three (3%).Survival was significantly correlated with PET/CT findings. Median survival was 3.4 years for patients with a positive PET/CT test but has not yet been reached in the PET/CT-negative group. The hazard ratio for PET/CT positivity was almost 3.4 (
p
= .0026 by log rank test), Souvatzoglou said. Senior investigator Dr. Andreus K. Buck, also from the nuclear medicine department of Technical University, emphasized that PET/CT renders information on the entire body and thus finds metastases missed by MRI and other imaging modalities. "With PET/CT we have a whole-body technique. We are able to see the uncommon metastases, such as cutaneous lesions," he said. "It also offers much better specificity. We can see the lesions clearly on CT and with the PET component we can determine if they are malignant." For more information from the Diagnostic Imaging archives:
Whole-body cancer staging requires frequent follow-up in some patients
PET affects treatment in over a third of cancer cases
PET/CT finds footing in breast, cervical, and ovarian carcinoma
What is the Best Use of AI in CT Lung Cancer Screening?
April 18th 2025In comparison to radiologist assessment, the use of AI to pre-screen patients with low-dose CT lung cancer screening provided a 12 percent reduction in mean interpretation time with a slight increase in specificity and a slight decrease in the recall rate, according to new research.
The Reading Room: Racial and Ethnic Minorities, Cancer Screenings, and COVID-19
November 3rd 2020In this podcast episode, Dr. Shalom Kalnicki, from Montefiore and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, discusses the disparities minority patients face with cancer screenings and what can be done to increase access during the pandemic.
Can CT-Based AI Radiomics Enhance Prediction of Recurrence-Free Survival for Non-Metastatic ccRCC?
April 14th 2025In comparison to a model based on clinicopathological risk factors, a CT radiomics-based machine learning model offered greater than a 10 percent higher AUC for predicting five-year recurrence-free survival in patients with non-metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC).
Could Lymph Node Distribution Patterns on CT Improve Staging for Colon Cancer?
April 11th 2025For patients with microsatellite instability-high colon cancer, distribution-based clinical lymph node staging (dCN) with computed tomography (CT) offered nearly double the accuracy rate of clinical lymph node staging in a recent study.