A large-scale study of a computer-aided detection program for virtual colonoscopy showed solid performance, with almost 90% sensitivity for polyps 10 mm and larger, according to a presentation given at the sixth annual International Virtual Colonoscopy Symposium in Boston.
A large-scale study of a computer-aided detection program for virtual colonoscopy showed solid performance, with almost 90% sensitivity for polyps 10 mm and larger, according to a presentation given at the sixth annual International Virtual Colonoscopy Symposium in Boston.
Although still in its infancy, CAD for virtual colonoscopy garnered widespread attention at the symposium, including a slew of performance studies that will be presented at this year's RSNA meeting.
In research from one of the larger trials that will be presented at the RSNA meeting, Dr Ronald Summers, chief of clinical image processing service and virtual endoscopy and computer-aided diagnosis at the National Institutes of Health, and colleagues used a CAD system on data from the Department of Defense multicenter virtual colonoscopy trial. The data set included 1186 patients from three medical centers. There were two cancers and 178 adenomas 6 mm and larger.
Sensitivity per polyp achieved by the CAD system increased with an increase in polyp size:
False positives per patient declined with increasing polyp size:
Both cancers were detected with a rate of 0.7 false positives per patient, according to Summers.
The study examined a true screening population and used segmentally unblinded optical colonoscopy as a gold standard, said Dr. Jorge Soto, an associate professor of radiology at the Boston University School of Medicine.
"It is clear from this new data that CAD works," Soto said.
The optimism was tempered by caution. Soto, noting that larger studies of CAD were still needed, cautioned that a good CAD system added to a good radiologist doesn't automatically equal a better radiologist. Given the large numbers of false positives introduced by CAD systems, radiologists may be less likely to carefully scrutinize CAD marks, he said.
Still, both speakers advised keeping an eye out for a number of CAD studies that will be presented at the upcoming RSNA meeting.
"CAD is not only near, it is here," Summers said.
For more information from the online Diagnostic Imaging archives:
CAD holds key to screening virtual colonoscopy's future
Electronic subtraction fools CAD, leads to false positives
Seven Takeaways from Meta-Analysis of PSMA Radiotracers for Prostate Cancer Imaging
December 1st 2023In a newly published meta-analysis of 24 studies, researchers noted that the PSMA PET radiotracer 18F PSMA-1007 may provide more benefit than 68Ga Ga-PSMA-11 for primary staging of patients with prostate cancer and detection of local lesion recurrence, but also has drawbacks with higher liver uptake and multiple reports of false positive bone lesions.
Study: Regular Mammography Screening Reduces Breast Cancer Mortality Risk by More than 70 Percent
November 30th 2023Consistent adherence to the five most recent mammography screenings prior to a breast cancer diagnosis reduced breast cancer death risk by 72 percent in comparison to women who did not have the mammography screening, according to new research findings presented at the annual Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) conference.
Chest CT Study Shows Higher Emphysema Risk from Combination of Marijuana and Cigarette Smoking
November 28th 2023People who smoke marijuana and cigarettes have 12 times the risk for centrilobular emphysema than non-smokers, according to new computed tomography (CT) research presented at the annual Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) conference.