Research reveals some facemasks and respirators worn to protect against COVID-19 contain ferromagnetic components.
The personal protective equipment (PPE) that MRI technologists are wearing to ward off COVID-19 infection could be unsafe for the imaging suite, a new study has found.
Respirators, including N95 masks (called FFP2 or FFP3 in Europe), can contain magnetic components. Consequently, wearing them into the imaging suite can put technologists at risk, said a team led by O.M. Murray, M.D., of Mater Private Hospital in Dublin, Ireland. They published their findings in the June issue of Clinical Radiology.
“Staff accompanying patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 are likely to be wearing respirators when they arrive at the MRI room,” Murray’s team wrote. “MRI staff may also be wearing a respirator as part of their personal protective equipment when dealing with these patients. These staff members may not be aware that respirators and facemasks do not have MRI safety documentation and, as such, require testing.”
To determine whether these masks could pose a risk, the team evaluated four respirators:
For the test, the team assessed the respirators with a handheld magnet of less than 1,000 Gauss outside the MRI control area. In addition, they tested the masks on human head phantoms set on the MRI table.
According to test results, the 3M and Kolmi respirators included parts that did respond to the magnet. Halyard did not. Additionally, the aluminum strip on the nasal bridge of the Dahlhausen surgical mask had no significant effect on imaging, and it also exhibited no signs of magnetism.
Consequently, Murray’s team suggested, to maximize safety, technologists would benefit from testing face masks and respirators before putting one on and wearing it into the MRI suite.
“This study has shown that several commercially available respirators contain ferromagnetic components, and are, thus, regarded as ‘MRI unsafe,’” the team said. “The use of these respirators by staff in the MRI room is contraindicated, both for MRI safety reasons and because they offer suboptimal protection against COVID-19 due to torque, causing a break in the seal at mask-user interface.”
Stay at the forefront of radiology with the Diagnostic Imaging newsletter, delivering the latest news, clinical insights, and imaging advancements for today’s radiologists.
Large Medicare Study Shows Black Men Less Likely to Receive PET and MRI for Prostate Cancer Imaging
August 1st 2025An analysis of over 749,000 Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with prostate cancer over a five-year period found that Black men were 13 percent less likely to receive PET imaging and 16 percent less likely to receive MRI in comparison to White men.
The Reading Room Podcast: A Closer Look at Remote MRI Safety, Part 3
August 1st 2025In the third of a three-part podcast episode, Emanuel Kanal, M.D. and Tobias Gilk, MRSO, MRSE, discuss strategies for maintaining the integrity of time-out procedures and communication with remote MRI scanning.
The Reading Room Podcast: A Closer Look at Remote MRI Safety, Part 2
August 1st 2025In the second of a multi-part podcast episode, Emanuel Kanal, M.D. and Tobias Gilk, MRSO, MRSE, share their perspectives on remote MRI safety protocols for ensuring screening accuracy and adherence to conditional implant guidelines as well as a rapid and effective response to adverse events.
Study Reveals Significant Prevalence of Abnormal PET/MRI and Dual-Energy CT Findings with Long Covid
August 1st 2025In a prospective study involving nearly 100 patients with Long Covid, 57 percent of patients had PET/MRI abnormalities and 90 percent of the cohort had abnormalities on dual-energy CT scans.