Radiologists can improve their screening of mammograms if they perform the diagnostic screening on cases that they have recalled.
Radiologists who perform diagnostic work-ups for recalled screening work-ups may see an improvement in their screening performance, according to a study published in the journal Radiology.
Researchers from Washington, Oregon, California, Maryland, Vermont, North Carolina, and New Hampshire conducted a study to examine radiologists’ screening performance in relation to the number of diagnostic work-ups performed after abnormal findings are discovered at screening mammography by the same radiologist or by different radiologists.
The study included 651,671 screening mammograms that were read by 96 radiologists in the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium to cancer registries between 2002 and 2006. Of interest were the sensitivity and false-positive rate (FPR) of screening mammography, and the cancer detection rate (CDR).
The researchers assessed associations between the volume of recalled screening mammograms where the same radiologist interpreted both the diagnostic and the screening images (their “own” mammograms), and diagnostic and screening images that may have been read by any radiologist (“any” mammograms). The screening performance and any associations between total annual volume and performance according to the volume of diagnostic work-up were also evaluated.
The results showed that for the radiologist who performed diagnostic work-up after screening:
• 38% performed the work-up for 25 or fewer of their own recalled screening
• 24% performed the work-up for 0 to 50 mammograms
• 39% performed the work-up for more than 50 mammograms
For the mammograms where any radiologist may have done the diagnostic work-up:
• 24% of radiologists performed the work-up for 0 to 50 mammograms
• 32% performed the work-up for 51 to 125 mammograms
• 44% performed the work-up for more than 125 mammograms
“With increasing numbers of radiologist work-ups for their own recalled mammograms, the sensitivity (P = .039), FPR (P = .004), and CDR (P < .001) of screening mammography increased, yielding a stepped increase in women recalled per cancer detected from 17.4 for 25 or fewer mammograms to 24.6 for more than 50 mammograms,” the authors wrote. “Increases in work-ups for any radiologist yielded significant increases in FPR (P = .011) and CDR (P = .001) and a nonsignificant increase in sensitivity (P = .15).”
The researchers also found that the radiologists with a lower annual volume of any work-ups had consistently lower FPR, sensitivity, and CDR at all annual interpretive volumes.
The researchers concluded that for radiologists to improve their mammography screening performance, they should work up a minimum of their own recalled cases.
Mammography and Breast MRI: Is it Time to Evaluate Strategies as Opposed to Modalities?
July 5th 2024The combination of mammography with breast MRI within 90 days had a 96.2 percent sensitivity in comparison to 48.1 percent for mammography and 79.7 percent for breast MRI performed within 91 to 270 days after index mammography, according to newly published research.
ACR Collaborative Model Leads to 35 Percent Improvement with Mammography Positioning Criteria
July 1st 2024Noting significant variation with facilities for achieving passing criteria for mammography positioning, researchers found that structured interventions, ranging from weekly auditing of images taken by technologists to mechanisms for feedback from radiologists to technologists, led to significant improvements in a multicenter study.