New audit data that will allow benchmarking in screening mammography for U.S. practices are set to be published in the October 2006 issue of Radiology.
New audit data that will allow benchmarking in screening mammography for U.S. practices are set to be published in the October 2006 issue of Radiology.
Data from close to 200 facilities and 1.1 million women participating in the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium (BCSC) from1996 to 2002 show a good cancer detection rate of 4.8 per 1000 women, according to the study, which was funded by the National Cancer Institute. Most of the women participating in the study were aged 40 to 70 years.
The new screening mammography data will contribute to understanding about mammography best practice, which has not been fully defined in the U.S. Medical audit data may be used to measure performance and to implement changes to improve quality of services.
Data are based on 2.6 million screening mammograms read by about 800 radiologists at BCSC sites. The results reported in Radiology include the following conclusions:
Screening mammography data complement BSCC data on performance in diagnostic mammography, published by Sickles et al in Radiology in June 2005.
For more information, see the Diagnostic Imaging archives:
Screening mammography: Practitioners consider Europe in the quest for better quality
Centers of excellence could improve mammography's quality profile
Government highlights barriers to mammography in rural and some urban areas
CT-based technologies elevate mammography
Stay at the forefront of radiology with the Diagnostic Imaging newsletter, delivering the latest news, clinical insights, and imaging advancements for today’s radiologists.
Mammography Study: AI Facilitates Greater Accuracy and Longer Fixation Time on Suspicious Areas
July 8th 2025While noting no differences in sensitivity, specificity or reading time with adjunctive AI for mammography screening, the authors of a new study noted a 4 percent higher AUC and increased fixation time on lesion regions.
Can Contrast-Enhanced Mammography be a Viable Screening Alternative to Breast MRI?
June 17th 2025While the addition of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) to digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) led to over a 13 percent increase in false positive cases, researchers also noted over double the cancer yield per 1,000 women in comparison to DBT alone.
Contrast-Enhanced Mammography and High-Concentration ICM Dosing: What a New Study Reveals
June 16th 2025New research showed a 96 to 97 percent sensitivity for contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) with an increased iodine delivery rate facilitating robust contrast enhancement for women with aggressive breast cancer.