Should Radiologists Deliver Results Directly to Patients?

Article

Should radiologists immediately deliver the exam results? Are there certain situations where it is more appropriate to do so, and what about the time required to consult with the patient about the result?

Should radiologists deliver results immediately after the imaging exam?

It’s a question posed to a Diagnostic Imaging LinkedIn group that continues to generate debate.

On one hand patients tend to want results immediately. They certainly have the right to demand timely information, and why not receive that information from the specialist with the expertise of the scan and the knowledge of the particular result?

However, the radiologist might not have a complete case history on the patient or be prepared to discuss implications or a treatment plan. The radiologist might not be as familiar with the case as the referring physician. And perhaps that referring physician should be notified first, and might be reluctant to give up control of the case.

One respondent on the LinkedIn thread had an interesting point about patient demand driving a change in the radiologists role: “I believe we will continue to see an increasing demand by patients for more immediate results, and radiology practices will have to do a better job of explaining the workflow process to those patients, or risk losing a percentage of their business to concierge practices that will, in fact, provide more immediate results and personal service.”

Similarly, our own blogger Mark Klein recently wrote about how patients don’t always consider their radiologists as their physicians. But he argued that radiologists are in a unique position to provide some comfort and compassion to patients. “Our future depends on demonstrating that we add substantially more than we cost to the healthcare equation,” he wrote.

So, I wonder. How does the radiologist’s evolving role affect that relationship? Should radiologists deliver the exam results? Are there certain situations where it is more appropriate to do so, such as if the results are negative? But what about more complex cases? Do you deliver the good news, but not the bad?

And what about the time required (and of course, the reimbursement) to consult with the patient about the result?

Tell us what you think.

Recent Videos
Improving Access to Nuclear Imaging: An Interview with SNMMI President Jean-Luc C. Urbain, MD, PhD
SNMMI: 18F-Piflufolastat PSMA PET/CT Offers High PPV for Local PCa Recurrence Regardless of PSA Level
SNMMI: NIH Researcher Discusses Potential of 18F-Fluciclovine for Multiple Myeloma Detection
SNMMI: What Tau PET Findings May Reveal About Modifiable Factors for Alzheimer’s Disease
Emerging Insights on the Use of FES PET for Women with Lobular Breast Cancer
Can Generative AI Reinvent Radiology Reporting?: An Interview with Samir Abboud, MD
Mammography Study Reveals Over Sixfold Higher Risk of Advanced Cancer Presentation with Symptom-Detected Cancers
Combining Advances in Computed Tomography Angiography with AI to Enhance Preventive Care
Study: MRI-Based AI Enhances Detection of Seminal Vesicle Invasion in Prostate Cancer
What New Research Reveals About the Impact of AI and DBT Screening: An Interview with Manisha Bahl, MD
Related Content
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.