SSFP serves as good start to abdominal MR exams
SSFP serves as good start to abdominal MR exams
The patient’s back pain was too severe to finish the MRI exam. Her conventional full MRI abdominal study was supposed to take 25 minutes, but-fortunately for her-she could tolerate lying in the scanner long enough to complete the protocol’s first sequence. Those five minutes were just enough time to complete the three-plane survey with a steady-state free precession pulse sequence. Her radiologist used it alone to diagnose her renal cell carcinoma.
The case is hypothetical, but the benefits of SSFP in the abdomen are real. A study of 114 patients by Dr. Michael Dutka and colleagues at Thomas Jefferson Univers ity Hospital in Philadelphia has established the value of rapid surveys with SSFP at beginning of comprehensive abdominal MRI exams (JMRI 2008;27[1]:198-203).
First described in 1986, SSFP has been widely adopted as the pulse sequence of choice for cardiac MRI. Its ability to freeze anatomic motion and to produce high contrast-to-noise ratio for bright blood imaging makes it a natural choice for imaging rapidly moving organs, but its limited ability to depict metastases or solid lesions in solid organs contributed to its slower adoption elsewhere in the body.
A comprehensive MRI survey involves heavily and moderately T2-weighted turbo spin-echo, T1-weighted dual gradient-echo, fat-suppressed 3D dynamic contrast-enhanced gradient-echo, delayed postcontrast fat-suppressed T1-weighted, and fat-suppressed T2-weighted pulse se quences. Radial MR cholangiopancreatography is also often performed.
Dutka, an MRI fellow, and his fellow researchers demonstrated SSFP was five times faster than the full abdominal MRI exam and detected 87.3% of clinically important findings and 93.3% of malignancies identified on the full exam.
“SSFP alone is not as definitive as a full MR exam, but it is a very meaningful survey,” said Dr. Donald Mitchell, chief of body MRI at Thomas Jefferson and a coauthor of the study. “It should be incorporated at the beginning of every abdominal MRI exam.”
Can Contrast-Enhanced Mammography be a Viable Screening Alternative to Breast MRI?
June 17th 2025While the addition of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) to digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) led to over a 13 percent increase in false positive cases, researchers also noted over double the cancer yield per 1,000 women in comparison to DBT alone.
FDA Clears Enhanced MRI-Guided Laser Ablation System
June 5th 2025An alternative to an open neurosurgical approach, the Visualase V2 MRI-Guided Laser Ablation System reportedly utilizes laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) for targeted soft tissue ablation in patients with brain tumors and focal epilepsy.
Possible Real-Time Adaptive Approach to Breast MRI Suggests ‘New Era’ of AI-Directed MRI
June 3rd 2025Assessing the simulated use of AI-generated suspicion scores for determining whether one should continue with full MRI or shift to an abbreviated MRI, the authors of a new study noted comparable sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value for biopsies between the MRI approaches.
