- Diagnostic Imaging Vol 31 No 4
- Volume 31
- Issue 4
Study blasts agenciesfor radiation standards
A study from the Institute for Energy and Environment Research blasted U.S. regulators for relying on radiation protection rules that underestimate exposure risks for women and children because they are based on standards of a “reference man,” a hypothetical 20 to 30-year-old white male.
A study from the Institute for Energy and Environment Research blasted U.S. regulators for relying on radiation protection rules that underestimate exposure risks for women and children because they are based on standards of a “reference man,” a hypothetical 20 to 30-year-old white male.
At least three federal agencies-the Environmental Protection Agency, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, and Department of Energy-still use reference-man criteria to guide radiation dose regulations and compliance assessment. According to IEER president Arjun Makihjani, Ph.D., current policy fails to protect groups other than young adult males. A female infant, for instance, has about a seven times greater chance of developing cancer than a 30-year-old man from the same radiation dose. The report recommends that compliance with radiation protection always be estimated by calculating doses for those at the greatest risk from excess exposure.
Articles in this issue
about 17 years ago
Dismal economy now hidesprosperity just around the bendabout 17 years ago
Serial mummy scanscapture CT advancesabout 17 years ago
Apple hypes iPhone radiology applicationabout 17 years ago
FSE-Cube earns praise forquality 3T knee MR imagingabout 17 years ago
ACR, ARRS linkup joinseducation, political goalsabout 17 years ago
Radiation dose fears colorcoronary CTA guidelinesabout 17 years ago
Heterotropic Ossificationabout 17 years ago
Inquiry concludes first-year residents not ready for callabout 17 years ago
Pericardial fat predicts riskof coronary artery diseaseabout 17 years ago
Private imaging facilitiesgrew at hospitals' expense










