Study finds female radiologists more prone to transcription errors

Article

Female radiology residents tend to commit transcription errors at a significantly higher rate compared with male residents when using commercial voice recognition applications, according to a recent study.

Female radiology residents tend to commit transcription errors at a significantly higher rate compared with male residents when using commercial voice recognition applications, according to a recent study.

Error rates among male residents were found to range from 2.5% to 13.9% on 50 dictated reports, while female error rates on the same number of dictated reports ranged from 1.5% to 20.6%. Interestingly, both the lowest error rate (1.5%) and the highest error rate (20.5) on a single report were by female residents.

Results of the study were presented at the May meeting of the American Roentgen Ray Society.

"The discrepancy may have a significant negative impact on reporting accuracy and productivity for female radiologists," said lead author Dr. Syed Ali, a University of Maryland radiology resident.

The discovery was made after the university's radiology department made the transition recently to speech recognition from digital dictation. The move prompted department officials to investigate how to increase accuracy rates and what factors adversely affected speech recognition.

During the investigation, the department noticed some of the residents had higher accuracy rates than others, which raised questions about the relative importance of various U.S. or foreign accents on speech recognition accuracy. This subsequently prompted the researchers to also wonder whether error rates were gender related.

"We are not aware of any previous reports in the literature pertaining to this topic," Ali said.

The immediate impact of the study for radiologists is an increased level of awareness that women may need to spend more time training on the system than their male counterparts and may have to work somewhat harder to make the system successful. This could include more time training the system to recognize particular words or phrases or using macros or actually altering their dictation style to increase recognition rates, he said.

"As an increasing number of nonradiologist physicians use speech recognition as part of the medical record, we anticipate a similar bias toward higher recognition rates for males," Ali said.

Any efforts to improve recognition rates will have a positive impact on physicians and patients by reducing error rates and improving productivity, he said.

It may also be possible to "preprocess" speech for women to increase accuracy using software that can alter the pitch and volume of voice files, Ali said.

Recent Videos
Can AI Assessment of Longitudinal MRI Scans Improve Prediction for Pediatric Glioma Recurrence?
A Closer Look at MRI-Guided Adaptive Radiotherapy for Monitoring and Treating Glioblastomas
Incorporating CT Colonography into Radiology Practice
What New Research Reveals About Computed Tomography and Radiation-Induced Cancer Risk
What New Interventional Radiology Research Reveals About Treatment for Breast Cancer Liver Metastases
New Mammography Studies Assess Image-Based AI Risk Models and Breast Arterial Calcification Detection
Can Deep Learning Provide a CT-Less Alternative for Attenuation Compensation with SPECT MPI?
Employing AI in Detecting Subdural Hematomas on Head CTs: An Interview with Jeremy Heit, MD, PhD
Pertinent Insights into the Imaging of Patients with Marfan Syndrome
What New Brain MRI Research Reveals About Cannabis Use and Working Memory Tasks
Related Content
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.