• AI
  • Molecular Imaging
  • CT
  • X-Ray
  • Ultrasound
  • MRI
  • Facility Management
  • Mammography

Study Reveals Benefits of Photon-Counting CT for Assessing Acute Pulmonary Embolism

News
Article

In comparison to energy-integrating detector CT for the workup of suspected acute pulmonary embolism, the use of photon-counting detector CT reduced radiation dosing by 48 percent, according to newly published research.

Emerging research shows that photon-counting detector computed tomography (PCD-CT) led to shorter image acquisition time, significantly reduced radiation dosing and a more than 60 percent higher percentage of artifact-free examinations in comparison to energy-integrating detector CT (EID-CT) for the workup of suspected pulmonary embolism (PE).

For the retrospective study, recently published in European Radiology, researchers compared the use of EID-CT (158 patients in group 1) and PCD-CT (172 patients in group 2) in assessing suspected acute pulmonary embolism. The EID-CT cohort was comprised of two subgroups with group 1a (105 patients) receiving dual-energy EID-CT and group 1b (53 severely dyspneic patients) having single-energy EID-CT, according to the study.

In comparison to patients who had dual-energy EID-CT, the researchers found that PCD-CT led to lower mean image acquisition time (0.9 seconds vs. four seconds) as well as significant reductions in CT dose index volume (CTDIvol) (5.1 mGy vs. 9.5 mGy) and dose-length product (DLP) (169 mGy-cm vs. 323.4 mGy-cm).

Study Reveals Benefits of Photon-Counting CT for Assessing Acute Pulmonary Embolism

Here one can see reconstructed transverse computed tomography (CT) sections via spectral acquisitions with EID-CT (left) and PCD-CT (right). While both approaches had a similar level of attenuation within the pulmonary trunk and PCD-CT had higher objective image noise (21.9 HU vs. 15.5 HU), the dose length product (DLP) for PCD-CT was 34 percent lower (185 mGy-cm) than that of EID-CT (282 mGy cm). (Images courtesy of European Radiology.)

“These results are in line with those recently reported in oncologic populations in which the radiation dose of PCD-CT examinations was significantly reduced compared to examinations acquired with comparable protocol settings on second-generation dual source CT equipment. In our study, the CTDIvol and DLP in (the PCD-CT group) were reduced by 46.3% and 47.7%, respectively, compared to (the dual-energy RID-CT group),” wrote lead study author Martine Remy-Jardin, M.D., Ph.D., who is affiliated with the Department of Thoracic Imaging at the University of Lille in Lille, France, and colleagues.

While mean image noise was higher in the PCD-CT cohort in comparison to patients who had dual-energy EID-CT (20.3 HU vs. 17.3 HU), the researchers found that the percentage of artifact-free exams with PCD-CT was over 60 percent higher than that of dual-energy EID-CT (89 percent vs. 28.6 percent).

Three Key Takeaways

  1. Reduced radiation dosing and image acquisition time. Photon-counting detector computed tomography (PCD-CT) offers substantial benefits over energy-integrating detector CT (EID-CT) in suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) cases. PCD-CT demonstrated significantly shorter image acquisition times (0.9 seconds vs. four seconds) and notable reductions in both CT dose index volume (CTDIvol) and dose-length product (DLP), leading to a decrease in radiation exposure by approximately 46-48 percent compared to dual-energy EID-CT.
  2. Higher percentage of artifact-free examinations. PCD-CT exhibited a significant improvement in image quality, with over a 60 percent higher percentage of artifact-free examinations compared to dual-energy EID-CT. Motion artifacts, particularly cardiogenic motion artifacts, were substantially reduced in PCD-CT scans due to the faster data acquisition speed, resulting in nearly 90 percent of PCD-CT examinations being free of perceptible motion around the left ventricle.
  3. Advantages of low-energy images. Utilizing lower-energy images in PCD-CT can overcome limitations related to transient interruption of contrast and/or a patent foramen ovale, resulting in improved diagnostic accuracy. Retrospective reading of low-energy images in all patients scanned with PCD-CT provides a significant advantage in daily routine, previously unavailable in a considerable portion of patients scanned with EID-CT.

“Regarding motion artifacts, the speed of data acquisition in (the PCD-CT group) explains the significant difference in the distribution of cardiogenic motion artifacts between (the PCD-CT group) and (the dual-energy EID-CT group) with no perceptible motion around the left ventricle in 89.0% of (PCD-CT) examinations, a result very close to the 90.6% of (dual-energy EID-CT) examinations free of cardiogenic artifacts,” pointed out Remy-Jardin and colleagues.

(Editor’s note: For related content, see “Is Photon Counting CT a Better Option than Dual-Energy CT for Pulmonary Angiography?,” “Study Says Photon-Counting CT Offers Better Lung Assessment than Conventional CT” and “Study: Photon-Counting CT for Pulmonary Angiography Allows Significant ICM Reduction.”)

When there is opacification of pulmonary arteries caused by transient interruption of contrast and/or a patent foramen ovale, the study authors suggested that utilizing lower-energy images can overcome this limitation.

“The retrospective reading of low-energy images in all patients scanned with PCD-CT is an obvious advantage in daily routine, previously inaccessible in more than one-third of patients scanned with EID-CT,” added Remy-Jardin and colleagues.

Recent Videos
Does Initial CCTA Provide the Best Assessment of Stable Chest Pain?
Nina Kottler, MD, MS
Practical Insights on CT and MRI Neuroimaging and Reporting for Stroke Patients
Related Content
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.