Charges for positron emission tomography examinations vary widely,and discounting is common, according to a report released lastmonth. Centers eager to boost the use of PET trim as much as $800off PET exams that can cost over $2000, the report found.
Charges for positron emission tomography examinations vary widely,and discounting is common, according to a report released lastmonth. Centers eager to boost the use of PET trim as much as $800off PET exams that can cost over $2000, the report found.
Averaging the costs and charges produced more moderate numbers,however. The average charge for a PET exam at 24 U.S. sites was$1742, slightly more than the average $1716 cost per scan, accordingto the study. If PET facilities can perform about six scans perday, costs could decline to about $1318 per scan.
The consulting firm of Coopers and Lybrand conducted the study,under contract to the Institute for Clinical PET.
Because many of the surveyed centers had begun operating withinthe past 14 months, patient charges tended to be extraordinarilylow in order to attract patients. As a result, the ratio betweentechnical and professional fees charged at the centers may beskewed, compared to those of conventional imaging techniques,said Dr. John C. Mazziotta, ICP president.
The intent of the study was to get a handle on this financiallyelusive modality, according to J. Michael McGehee, ICP executivedirector. The ICP hopes the Health Care Financing Administrationwill reference its report when considering PET for Medicare reimbursement,possibly in 1992. Whether the report will help or hurt is notcertain, he said.
"A series of numbers was discussed as to what the costof PET actually was," McGehee said. "There was a widediscrepancy from low to high and somewhere in the middle. Thereis now a clear, documented report that spells out in comprehensivedetail what the cost of PET actually is."
The report suffers from the same variables that affect clinicalPET, however. Low throughput was common as centers worked to evaluateand optimize procedures, Mazziotta said.
An additional problem in conducting the financial analyseswas that many centers that participated in the survey are affiliatedwith universities and perform both research and clinical studies,making it all but impossible to determine true costs, he said.
Where Things Stand with the Radiologist Shortage
June 18th 2025A new report conveys the cumulative impact of ongoing challenges with radiologist residency positions, reimbursement, post-COVID-19 attrition rates and the aging of the population upon the persistent shortage of radiologists in the United States.
How to Successfully Launch a CCTA Program at Your Hospital or Practice
June 11th 2025Emphasizing increasing recognition of the capability of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) for the evaluation of acute and stable chest pain, this author defuses common misperceptions and reviews key considerations for implementation of a CCTA program.
The Reading Room: Artificial Intelligence: What RSNA 2020 Offered, and What 2021 Could Bring
December 5th 2020Nina Kottler, M.D., chief medical officer of AI at Radiology Partners, discusses, during RSNA 2020, what new developments the annual meeting provided about these technologies, sessions to access, and what to expect in the coming year.
Mammography AI Platform for Five-Year Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Gets FDA De Novo Authorization
June 2nd 2025Through AI recognition of subtle patterns in breast tissue on screening mammograms, the Clairity Breast software reportedly provides validated risk scoring for predicting one’s five-year risk of breast cancer.