Force feedback shows potential for tissue segmentation and interventional planning
Engineers are always on the lookout for new and better ways to present data. So it's been with the transition from 2D to 3D and, lately, to 4D, with the capture of dynamic organs or the display of large volumes of data. But even the most advanced of these techniques, whether fly-throughs of the colon or 4D fetal imaging, may not be the ultimate means for analyzing medical images.
A doctoral student at Uppsala University in Sweden has come up with a workstation that allows radiologists to "feel" as well as see radiologic images.
Erik Vidholm uses force feedback, also called haptics, to translate tissue characteristics into "feeling." This sense of touch is transmitted to the user through a haptic pen built into a workstation that displays stereo graphics. An experimental workstation, constructed by Vidholm as part of his doctoral research, allows operators to see and probe the contours of organs.
Working at the Center for Image Analysis at Uppsala University's Center, Vidholm has focused on the use of virtual touch as a way to speed the segmentation of reconstructed tissues by providing information about imaging data that are hard to visualize. Collaborators at the department of oncology, radiology, and clinical immunology at Uppsala University Hospital and the ITEE biomedical engineering group at the University of Queensland in Brisbane, Australia, provided the imaging data and assisted in the evaluation and validation of results from his haptic postprocessing.
Early testing has produced encouraging results, with liver CT data and breast MR data reconstructed volumetrically. In this work, the haptic rendering of medical images has allowed the user to feel boundaries between tissues and provide input to segmentation algorithms. Ultimately, the technology might find a place in planning surgery or radiation therapy, but this is a long way off. Vidholm's work has shown only the potential for haptics, a potential that remains to be quantitatively evaluated and developed.
Can Contrast-Enhanced Mammography be a Viable Screening Alternative to Breast MRI?
June 17th 2025While the addition of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) to digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) led to over a 13 percent increase in false positive cases, researchers also noted over double the cancer yield per 1,000 women in comparison to DBT alone.
FDA Clears Enhanced MRI-Guided Laser Ablation System
June 5th 2025An alternative to an open neurosurgical approach, the Visualase V2 MRI-Guided Laser Ablation System reportedly utilizes laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) for targeted soft tissue ablation in patients with brain tumors and focal epilepsy.
Possible Real-Time Adaptive Approach to Breast MRI Suggests ‘New Era’ of AI-Directed MRI
June 3rd 2025Assessing the simulated use of AI-generated suspicion scores for determining whether one should continue with full MRI or shift to an abbreviated MRI, the authors of a new study noted comparable sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value for biopsies between the MRI approaches.