The feasibility of hub-and-spoke mammography, in which breast imaging studies are performed at satellite centers and read at a centralized reading station, has been confirmed through an evaluation of 30,000 cases and three years of clinical experience. The Columbia University study finds the transmission and interpretation of digital mammography exams to and from a remote location through commercially available high-speed cable Internet access is safe, reliable, and cost-effective.
The feasibility of hub-and-spoke mammography, in which breast imaging studies are performed at satellite centers and read at a centralized reading station, has been confirmed through an evaluation of 30,000 cases and three years of clinical experience. The Columbia University study finds the transmission and interpretation of digital mammography exams to and from a remote location through commercially available high-speed cable Internet access is safe, reliable, and cost-effective.
"There haven't been any glitches since we began, but we have made long-distance transmission better and faster," said principal investigator Dr. Alan R. Melton, an assistant professor of radiology at Columbia. "We are refining the system, establishing online dictation, increasing transmission speeds, increasing the efficiency of the routing, and diminishing downtime."
Melton and colleagues reviewed more than 29,500 cases produced from two full-field digital mammography devices and read by a digitalcomputer-aided detection system at an offsite screening facility. Cases were sent to a mammography workstation in a primary diagnostic center usinga two-way DICOM protocol. They went through a virtual private network via cable Internet. Findings were presented at the 2008 American Roentgen Ray Society meeting.
Back in 2005, transmission of an average 125-MB Mammography Quality Standards Act-compliant case without compression and in real-time took approximately 24 seconds. After the proper hardware and network upgrades, a case of similar image quality can be transmitted today in less than eight seconds, according to Melton. Case turnaround from obtaining the images to final report ranges from 10 minutes to two days.
There are serious concerns regarding the future of screening mammography, according to Melton. The future looks bleak, as the demand for mammography services increases and the pool of well-trained mammography fellows dwindles. As digital mammography increases its penetration into the system, radiologists should start considering the establishment of regional telemammography screening centers with highly skilled radiologists and mammographers, he said.
"The Europeans are already using the Internet to solve this impending crisis," he said.
-By H.A. Abella
Stay at the forefront of radiology with the Diagnostic Imaging newsletter, delivering the latest news, clinical insights, and imaging advancements for today’s radiologists.
Mammography Study: AI Facilitates Greater Accuracy and Longer Fixation Time on Suspicious Areas
July 8th 2025While noting no differences in sensitivity, specificity or reading time with adjunctive AI for mammography screening, the authors of a new study noted a 4 percent higher AUC and increased fixation time on lesion regions.
Can Contrast-Enhanced Mammography be a Viable Screening Alternative to Breast MRI?
June 17th 2025While the addition of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) to digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) led to over a 13 percent increase in false positive cases, researchers also noted over double the cancer yield per 1,000 women in comparison to DBT alone.
Contrast-Enhanced Mammography and High-Concentration ICM Dosing: What a New Study Reveals
June 16th 2025New research showed a 96 to 97 percent sensitivity for contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) with an increased iodine delivery rate facilitating robust contrast enhancement for women with aggressive breast cancer.