It was supposed to be a world-class IT network, one of the largest and most sophisticated implementations of PACS and electronic medical records ever attempted. But somewhere along the way, the U.K.’s effort to wire 150 English hospitals into the digital age has gone awry.
It was supposed to be a world-class IT network, one of the largest and most sophisticated implementations of PACS and electronic medical records ever attempted. But somewhere along the way, the U.K.'s effort to wire 150 English hospitals into the digital age has gone awry.
Frontline National Health Service workers in the U.K. are disappointed with the suboptimal rollout of the country's national program for information technology, according to a survey published in the August issue of the British Medical Journal. Investigators reported that while a centralized approach to IT implementation was laudable, success depended on not alienating the staff involved. Apparently, this is exactly what has happened.
Researchers from the department of public health and policy at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine surveyed personnel at four different hospitals. Staff at all of the hospitals reported a lack of clarity and communication from the national IT program's headquarters regarding future program developments.
"We were most surprised by the lack of two-way communication and clinical engagement in the process of implementation," said lead author Dr. Jane Hendy, a research fellow at the London School.
Hendy and colleagues interviewed 23 key IT, finance, and clinical staff at four acute-care NHS hospitals in England and examined documents and published data on the national IT project. To achieve a generalizability of results, researchers chose hospitals of various sizes, financial status, and star ratings.
The hospitals varied widely in their IT implementation abilities. Unrealistic timelines and uncertain IT implementation schedules resulted in low morale in the NHS staff involved in IT implementation, according to the investigators. Even the promise of short-term benefits could not convince NHS staff to enthusiastically embrace the national program, especially if they lost local IT functionality during the transition to a national IT infrastructure.
Researchers will continue to evaluate from both patient and staff perspectives the experience of individual users and the impact of the implementation on the organization as a whole, on working practices, and on patient care as the program gains momentum, Hendy said.
Improving NHS staff opinion and morale will require better communication and a more realistic sense of what is likely to be achieved and when, she said.
New Collaboration Offers Promise of Automating Prior Authorizations in Radiology with AI
March 26th 2025In addition to a variety of tools to promote radiology workflow efficiencies, the integration of the Gravity AI tools into the PowerServer RIS platform may reduce time-consuming prior authorizations to minutes for completion.
The Reading Room Podcast: Current Perspectives on the Updated Appropriate Use Criteria for Brain PET
March 18th 2025In a new podcast, Satoshi Minoshima, M.D., Ph.D., and James Williams, Ph.D., share their insights on the recently updated appropriate use criteria for amyloid PET and tau PET in patients with mild cognitive impairment.
Predicting Diabetes on CT Scans: What New Research Reveals with Pancreatic Imaging Biomarkers
March 25th 2025Attenuation-based biomarkers on computed tomography (CT) scans demonstrated a 93 percent interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) agreement across three pancreatic segmentation algorithms for predicting diabetes, according to a study involving over 9,700 patients.
Can Photon-Counting CT be an Alternative to MRI for Assessing Liver Fat Fraction?
March 21st 2025Photon-counting CT fat fraction evaluation offered a maximum sensitivity of 81 percent for detecting steatosis and had a 91 percent ICC agreement with MRI proton density fat fraction assessment, according to new prospective research.