It was supposed to be a world-class IT network, one of the largest and most sophisticated implementations of PACS and electronic medical records ever attempted. But somewhere along the way, the U.K.’s effort to wire 150 English hospitals into the digital age has gone awry.
It was supposed to be a world-class IT network, one of the largest and most sophisticated implementations of PACS and electronic medical records ever attempted. But somewhere along the way, the U.K.'s effort to wire 150 English hospitals into the digital age has gone awry.
Frontline National Health Service workers in the U.K. are disappointed with the suboptimal rollout of the country's national program for information technology, according to a survey published in the August issue of the British Medical Journal. Investigators reported that while a centralized approach to IT implementation was laudable, success depended on not alienating the staff involved. Apparently, this is exactly what has happened.
Researchers from the department of public health and policy at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine surveyed personnel at four different hospitals. Staff at all of the hospitals reported a lack of clarity and communication from the national IT program's headquarters regarding future program developments.
"We were most surprised by the lack of two-way communication and clinical engagement in the process of implementation," said lead author Dr. Jane Hendy, a research fellow at the London School.
Hendy and colleagues interviewed 23 key IT, finance, and clinical staff at four acute-care NHS hospitals in England and examined documents and published data on the national IT project. To achieve a generalizability of results, researchers chose hospitals of various sizes, financial status, and star ratings.
The hospitals varied widely in their IT implementation abilities. Unrealistic timelines and uncertain IT implementation schedules resulted in low morale in the NHS staff involved in IT implementation, according to the investigators. Even the promise of short-term benefits could not convince NHS staff to enthusiastically embrace the national program, especially if they lost local IT functionality during the transition to a national IT infrastructure.
Researchers will continue to evaluate from both patient and staff perspectives the experience of individual users and the impact of the implementation on the organization as a whole, on working practices, and on patient care as the program gains momentum, Hendy said.
Improving NHS staff opinion and morale will require better communication and a more realistic sense of what is likely to be achieved and when, she said.
Can Portable Dual-Energy X-Ray be a Viable Alternative to CT in the ICU?
September 13th 2024The use of a portable dual-energy X-ray detector in the ICU at one community hospital reportedly facilitated a 37.5 percent decrease in chest CT exams in comparison to the previous three months, according to research presented at the American Society of Emergency Radiology (ASER) meeting in Washington, D.C.
New Meta-Analysis Examines MRI Assessment for Treatment of Esophageal Cancer
September 12th 2024Diffusion-weighted MRI provided pooled sensitivity and specificity rates of 82 percent and 81 percent respectively for gauging patient response to concurrent chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer, according to new meta-analysis.
Study for Emerging PET/CT Agent Reveals ‘New Standard’ for Detecting Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
September 11th 2024Results from a multicenter phase 3 trial showed that the PET/CT imaging agent (89Zr)Zr-girentuximab had an 85.5 percent mean sensitivity rate for the diagnosis of clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
Can Radiomics and Autoencoders Enhance Real-Time Ultrasound Detection of Breast Cancer?
September 10th 2024Developed with breast ultrasound data from nearly 1,200 women, a model with mixed radiomic and autoencoder features had a 90 percent AUC for diagnosing breast cancer, according to new research.