Use multislice CT for coronary imaging only when EBCT is not available
I read with great interest your excellent May 27 online article, "Pediatric heart scans deliver high radiation dose," which depicts the alarmingly high effective radiation dose to radiosensitive breast structures during a multislice CT angiogram (http://www.dimag.com/showArticle.jhtml.?articleID=163701504).
I read with great interest your excellent May 27 online article, "Pediatric heart scans deliver high radiation dose," which depicts the alarmingly high effective radiation dose to radiosensitive breast structures during a multislice CT angiogram (http://www.dimag.com/showArticle.jhtml.?articleID=163701504).
An interesting presentation at the 2003 RSNA meeting revealed that even a simple coronary heart scan performed with a 16-slice spiral in an adult woman exposes her breasts to 3.7 rads. When challenged, the presenting radiologist could only defend the practice by stating her hope that her department "carefully examines the risk/benefit ratio before each scan."
Certainly, the risk needs to be kept low, and the benefit (of using a relatively invalidated spiral scanner for cardiac CT, often by radiology groups with little background in preventive cardiology) is questionable.
The effective dose to radiosensitive anterior structures from the electron-beam coronary heart scan procedure and electron-beam angiogram is markedly less than a 16-slice MSCT spiral for two reasons. The total dose with EBCT imaging is substantially lower, while the effective dose to breasts is modest, as only 17% of the total radiation passes anteriorly with this unique modality.
The total dose in adult MSCT angiograms is several times that of an electron-beam angiogram, which can accomplish the procedure at a fraction of the dose of a conventional angiogram. When it comes to effective doses to the breast, the discordance is greatly magnified. The importance of keeping procedure dose low is amplified for children, as their total cumulative lifetime exposure remains a question.
From an "information/millisievert" standpoint, a risk/benefit ratio, and certainly in accordance with the ALARA principle, one should consider using such a spiral scanner for coronary imaging only when there are no highly validated electron-beam CT scanners available.
-James Ehrlich, M.D.
President, Society for Responsible Preventive Imaging
Denver, CO
Can MRI-Guided Transurethral Ultrasound Ablation Have an Impact for Localized Prostate Cancer?
December 11th 2023Follow-up MRI imaging one year after transurethral ultrasound ablation revealed approximately 50 percent decreases in prostate volume and median PSA density, according to recently presented research findings at the 2023 Society of Urologic Oncology (SUO) Annual Meeting.
What a New Mammography Study Reveals About BMI, Race, Ethnicity and Advanced Breast Cancer Risk
December 8th 2023In a new study examining population attributable risk proportions (PARPs) based on data from over three million screening mammography exams, researchers found that postmenopausal Black women had the highest BMI-related PARP and premenopausal Asian and Pacific Islander women had the highest breast density-related PARP for advanced breast cancer.
Study: Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Changes Surgical Plan in 22.5 Percent of Breast Cancer Cases
December 7th 2023Contrast-enhanced mammography detected additional lesions in 43 percent of patients and led to additional biopsies in 18.2 percent of patients, over half of whom had malignant lesions, according to a study of over 500 women presented at the recent Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) conference.
What a New Study Reveals About Adjunctive DBT and Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancer
December 6th 2023The combination of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and digital mammography had a 21.6 higher invasive breast cancer detection rate for stage 1 tumors than digital mammography alone, according to a new study involving nearly 100,000 women.
